Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

131

Regarding the question of whether there is a God, there are exactly two Logical positions.

  1. I know there is a God

  2. I do not know if there is a God

All other positions require Belief, and this definitely includes Atheism.

In addition to this simple axiom, there is also something else to consider:

If you are able to formulate the question of whether there is a God, there is an omnipresent candidate for God which can not be excluded.

Atheism is a dark and diabolical Mind Prison. To escape, just use the key of Logic to set yourself free and let your mind shine.

For the record: I posted this in s/Tellpoal. This is about Logic, and not the Social Construct of Religion.

Regarding the question of whether there is a God, there are exactly two Logical positions. 1. I know there is a God 2. I do not know if there is a God All other positions require Belief, and this definitely includes Atheism. In addition to this simple axiom, there is also something else to consider: If you are able to formulate the question of whether there is a God, there is an omnipresent candidate for God which can not be excluded. Atheism is a dark and diabolical Mind Prison. To escape, just use the key of Logic to set yourself free and let your mind shine. For the record: I posted this in s/Tellpoal. This is about Logic, and not the Social Construct of Religion.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (47).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I agree a God would know he exists.

Then you admit that Statement #1 is true. And statement #2 is true as well. You have proven my axiom solid.

[–] • 0 pt

You have declared yourself the victor. I suspect few will agree.

Your logic is flawed and you do not appear interested in expounding further on your argument.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Argumentum Ad Populum Fallacy

If every person on the planet disagrees with the truth, that does not change the truth.

you do not appear interested in expounding further on your argument.

This is literally you trying to shame me for not wanting to argue a Strawman.

Thus far all you have managed to prove is that you do not abide by Logic.

[–] • 0 pt

From my perspective, you haven't argued against my point. You just made an illogical statement, claimed yourself the victor, and then refused to elaborate further.

Hence, my comment about you playing by your own rules.