You cannot logically "know" there is a God
Incorrect. By definition God would know he existed. You are also delving into Nihilism here and rejecting the idea of Personal Knowledge.
you have missed the cornerstone of religion: Faith.
Incorrect, I addressed it directly. Faith is a synonym for Belief.
Again: There are exactly two logical positions regarding the existence of God.
I know there is a God
I do not know if there is a God
All other positions require Belief.
Incorrect. By definition God would know he existed.
What God? You mean this God you cannot prove exists? How does this in any way refute my statement that one cannot logically "know" there is a God. You responded by saying "God knows he exists, therefore God exists."
Incorrect, I addressed it directly. Faith is a synonym for Belief.
LOL. You just said Faith and Belief are synonymous. In that case, let's try this
"you have missed the cornerstone of religion: Belief."
You literally didn't address a single point I made. You basically just claimed I'm wrong and restated your initial points.
You mean this God you cannot prove exists?
I did not say there was a God. You are simply making thing up and then acting upon your delusions as if they were real.
Religion Belief Faith
This isn't about Religion, or God for that matter. You think this post is about proving the existence of God, and that is not the case. The issue at hand here is whether you have a functioning mind and abide by logic, and your immediate retreat to Nihilism and Strawman arguments shows that you have failed this test.
I admit I was misunderstanding your initial statement.
My funamental issue with your position is your proposed axiom. Specifically, you claim there are only two possitions: I know there is a God, or I do not know there is a God. Agreed. You then claim, in this axiom, that "All other positions require Belief."
I do not accept this axiom as true. On the contrary, taking the position that "I know a God exists" requires faith/belief. The only option which does not require belief is "I do not know if a God exists."
Hence, your initial assumption (axiom) is self-defeating. To accept that you know there is a God means you're believing something you cannot prove.
The fact that the formulation of the question means there will always remain a possibility that there is a God, does not necessitate that acceptance of knowing a God exists requires no belief.
(post is archived)