Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

866

Regarding the question of whether there is a God, there are exactly two Logical positions.

  1. I know there is a God

  2. I do not know if there is a God

All other positions require Belief, and this definitely includes Atheism.

In addition to this simple axiom, there is also something else to consider:

If you are able to formulate the question of whether there is a God, there is an omnipresent candidate for God which can not be excluded.

Atheism is a dark and diabolical Mind Prison. To escape, just use the key of Logic to set yourself free and let your mind shine.

For the record: I posted this in s/Tellpoal. This is about Logic, and not the Social Construct of Religion.

Regarding the question of whether there is a God, there are exactly two Logical positions. 1. I know there is a God 2. I do not know if there is a God All other positions require Belief, and this definitely includes Atheism. In addition to this simple axiom, there is also something else to consider: If you are able to formulate the question of whether there is a God, there is an omnipresent candidate for God which can not be excluded. Atheism is a dark and diabolical Mind Prison. To escape, just use the key of Logic to set yourself free and let your mind shine. For the record: I posted this in s/Tellpoal. This is about Logic, and not the Social Construct of Religion.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (47).
[–] • 0 pt

Responding by pointing out logical fallacies is a logical fallacy.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Incorrect.

[–] • 0 pt

if you are able to formulate the question of whether there is a God, there is an omnipresent candidate for God which can not be excluded.

@ScreaminMime version

if you are able to formulate the question of whether there is a dildo up your ass, there is an omnipresent candidate for a dildo up your ass which can not be excluded.

You then responded to him by claiming he was employing logical fallacies.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

He replaced one thing for another and wanted to argue about the other thing. This is called a Strawman Logical Fallacy. The part about having a dildo up my ass is an Ad Hominem Logical fallacy.