> it amazes me what people will believe
It amazes me that someone who has your intellect blows off all ideas without digging further.
Haarp has been running tests recently. Years specifically to create man made Aurora's.
https://ei7gl.blogspot.com/2024/05/notice-upcoming-haarp-ionospheric-tests.html?m=1
It amazes me that someone who has your intellect blows off all ideas without digging further.
Haarp has been running tests recently. Years specifically to create man made Aurora's.
The storm brought a massive amount of energy to the Earth, but not enough to destroy things thanks to the magnetosphere. This is why we didn't have any real effects.
As for HAARP, humans don't have the ability to generate enough energy to cause the scale of auroral displays that were spread out over such a large area. We cannot reach those levels so HAARP didn't do it. In fact, HAARP would need many massive and dedicated power plants attached to it to even get close to that energy. Where are those power plants? Where are their massive power transmission lines?
I don't have to dig very far to call bullshit. I am an Electrical Engineer with a brain. I can use my brain to debunk BS because I'm not able to be swayed by "scary stories" of technology I don't understand. HAARP would glow (literally) like a motherfucker if it used the level of energy needed to make an auroral display of the magnitude caused by the storm. The air around it would ionize and you'd have electrical discharge that could not be ignored. It would be obvious it was the cause because it would show you where the source was. That didn't happen. Ham radio operators would have proof because they could see it's frequency signature around the world. They don't see it though.
I don't know why you want so desperately for these sort of things to be manmade and malicious. What is it you fear really? Why do you want this to be real?
> I don't know why you want so desperately for these sort of things to be manmade and malicious. What is it you fear really? Why do you want this to be real?
I'm a science nerd. Here's some interesting articles that may bring you up to speed.
https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/haarp-artificial-airglow-may-be-widely-visible-alaska
The are 3 easy ways to create the Aurora. Lasers to excite the ionosphere. Harp can do the same. They can also use a particle accelerator. These are within their own published research.
I'm a science nerd.
Then you should be more skeptical of things because science nerds would realize the scales of energy needed here are outside of human capability.
Here's some interesting articles that may bring you up to speed.
The HAARP experimental airglow is very small compared to the massive display caused by the magnetic storm. It is small because the energy HAARP can muster is small. The first article gives some numbers on this.
Similar to how solar energy produces a natural aurora, HAARP produces airglow by using intermittent bursts of high-frequency radio waves to excite electrons in earth’s ionosphere. With 180 high-frequency antennas arranged in a phased array over 33 acres, HAARP’s Ionospheric Research Instrument has the capacity to radiate 3.6 megawatts into the ionosphere and upper atmosphere.
180 "high frequency" antennas (2.8 to 10 MHz is NOT high frequency at all!) radiating 3.6 megawatts of power isn't much at all. A typical Walmart consume 1 megawatt-hour of energy. They are putting not quite 4 Walmarts-worth of energy into a small patch of the atmosphere. The sun's power output per square meter on Earth is about 1000 Watts. One square kilometer of area gets about 1 megawatt of solar energy. You would only need 4 square kilometers of sunlit area to exceed the HAARP output energy. The auroral displays the storm brought are tens of thousands of square kilometers. The size is massive and the energies immense compared to HAARP's meager abilities. That alone makes it extremely unlikely that HAARP could have played any part here. It's just not capable of such things.
The second article is just the same content as the first but smaller. It doesn't bring anything new to the table here.
But anyway, be a science nerd and use your brain to logically deduce that the storm was what produced the phenomenon because 3.6 Walmart's worth of energy isn't really much energy at all in this situation. The output frequencies are in the range of CPU clock speeds from the early 80s. HAARP isn't very "super" in these numbers either. Even ionizing the atmosphere with lasers (not gonna be very effective for so many reasons) or particle accelerator (also not very effective for similar reasons) won't do much because the energy levels are so low. The sun cannot be beaten by humans and our meager energy capabilities. Even converted the Earth's entire mass to energy would not exceed the sun's energy capabilities. That alone makes it impossible. We just can't muster that level of energy production or control. We're not even close to that.
(post is archived)