WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

451

Anyone got any reports of damages or failures that are causally linked to the solar storm? I can't find anything that indicates the storm had any effect on infrastructure or services. Our (((weak))) magnetic field did its job just fine as always.

Anyone got any reports of damages or failures that are causally linked to the solar storm? I can't find anything that indicates the storm had any effect on infrastructure or services. Our (((weak))) magnetic field did its job just fine as always.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts
[–] 0 pt

Nope, try again. The biggest ones are just hitting now.

Where is the proof that this is causally linked to the magnetic storm? I can go on DownDetector nearly any time and get similar problem reports. This isn't proof of anything since it is self-reported user data anyway.

Spectrum: 1000 reports (that's not unccommon for a large carrier) Cousera: 200 reports (Cousera is hardly an indicator of jack shit since they are a training site that isn't significant) Mediacom: 500 reports (who the fuck is Mediacom anyway?) Reddit: 90 reports (seriously you think this is a good data point?) WOW Networks: 200 reports (again, who the fuck is WOW Networks and why should it matter?)

These are badly cherry-picked data points. This is what you see everyday on DD. This is garbage data trying to fit a narrative of fear and uncertainty. Why are you lying like this?

[–] 0 pt

Yes, and the Carrington event never happened either. Don't call me a liar. You are poo pooing the biggest threat to human civilization.

[–] 0 pt

Yes, and the Carrington event never happened either. Don't call me a liar. You are poo pooing the biggest threat to human civilization.

jew mad bro?

[–] 4 pts

Here's a from Ben Davidson.

[–] 1 pt

So nothing then. Some minor service impacts that aren't directly and causally linked to the solar storms are the biggest issues presented here. The data from SOHO doesn't seem to reflect the danger level some are still predicting as the CMEs are not on direct trajectories with Earth. I expect we'll just get another light show and nothing more.

[–] 3 pts

I think more of the same, much like last night. All CMEs were roughly of similar density. No potential kill shots noted.

[–] 1 pt

Damn, my friend took some of those desert pics....

[–] 1 pt

Our (((weak))) magnetic field did its job just fine as always.

Are you suggesting the Carrington Event never happened? That we would be fine if it did?

I really don't understand what your point is, care to elaborate?

[–] 0 pt

Are you suggesting the Carrington Event never happened? That we would be fine if it did?

The Carrington Event was an atypical CME and solar flare combination that was higher in energy than the recent X-class storm. It was massive and resulted in aurora activity around the world. The recent storm didn't have that big and far reaching aurora activity. The effects on the telegraph system were not actually that significant and actually played out because of the spread-out nature of the lines which caused a bigger voltage potential differential. Modern systems are better able to handle such a thing and have safety systems in place for various fault types that a solar storm can bring.

I really don't understand what your point is, care to elaborate?

A bunch of people, including here on Poal, were convinced this was going to be a game over style happening for technology. I don't think the fear is warranted because it is driven by people who don't have knowledge in physics and electronics yet they are still pretending to be experts on the subjects. They just like to be afraid. It's a disease. :)

[–] 0 pt

The Carrington Event's effects were mostly seen on very long telegraph wires, which are rather different from today's power distribution wires. Mitigations against EMP have been put in place at many US substations which will reduce the effect. Communications lines are mostly fiber now, and they shouldn't be affected due to the way the power is injected. We're seeing disruptions in some radio communications, and while some physical issues may pop up I don't think they'll be many. Think of it like a Y2K event.

[–] 0 pt

Fiber optics are very much at risk, along with power infrastructure.

[–] 0 pt

I disagree. Care to provide more info?

[–] 0 pt

So much better than the last devastating cme... Oh, wait

[–] 0 pt

Yes, I have a failure of alertness due to staying up too late watching the pretty lights.

[–] 0 pt

I don't trust anything the mainstream says. I wouldn't be surprised if this were a test of operation bluebeam or some other high frequency tests.

Something of this magnitude with effects reaching that far south would have surely fried every electronic in North America.

[–] 0 pt

I don't trust anything the mainstream says. I wouldn't be surprised if this were a test of operation bluebeam or some other high frequency tests.

It amazes me what people will believe in because of what they want to be true.

Something of this magnitude with effects reaching that far south would have surely fried every electronic in North America.

Physics doesn't work the way you want it to. It's good that we don't rely on people's opinions like this when determining what could really happen.

[–] 0 pt

> it amazes me what people will believe

It amazes me that someone who has your intellect blows off all ideas without digging further.

Haarp has been running tests recently. Years specifically to create man made Aurora's.

https://ei7gl.blogspot.com/2024/05/notice-upcoming-haarp-ionospheric-tests.html?m=1

[–] 0 pt

It amazes me that someone who has your intellect blows off all ideas without digging further.

Haarp has been running tests recently. Years specifically to create man made Aurora's.

The storm brought a massive amount of energy to the Earth, but not enough to destroy things thanks to the magnetosphere. This is why we didn't have any real effects.

As for HAARP, humans don't have the ability to generate enough energy to cause the scale of auroral displays that were spread out over such a large area. We cannot reach those levels so HAARP didn't do it. In fact, HAARP would need many massive and dedicated power plants attached to it to even get close to that energy. Where are those power plants? Where are their massive power transmission lines?

I don't have to dig very far to call bullshit. I am an Electrical Engineer with a brain. I can use my brain to debunk BS because I'm not able to be swayed by "scary stories" of technology I don't understand. HAARP would glow (literally) like a motherfucker if it used the level of energy needed to make an auroral display of the magnitude caused by the storm. The air around it would ionize and you'd have electrical discharge that could not be ignored. It would be obvious it was the cause because it would show you where the source was. That didn't happen. Ham radio operators would have proof because they could see it's frequency signature around the world. They don't see it though.

I don't know why you want so desperately for these sort of things to be manmade and malicious. What is it you fear really? Why do you want this to be real?