Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

820

"The District of Columbia (DC) Court of Appeals has rejected Meta’s appeal to quash a sweeping subpoena that demanded it hand over “documents sufficient to identify all Facebook groups, pages, and accounts that have violated Facebook’s COVID-19 misinformation policy with respect to content concerning vaccines” to the DC government." No bad think, sit down and shut up! Big Brother is watching!

"The District of Columbia (DC) Court of Appeals has rejected Meta’s appeal to quash a sweeping subpoena that demanded it hand over “documents sufficient to identify all Facebook groups, pages, and accounts that have violated Facebook’s COVID-19 misinformation policy with respect to content concerning vaccines” to the DC government." No bad think, sit down and shut up! Big Brother is watching!

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts (edited )

And this, friends, is why you never post on a website that knows who you are. Freedom my ass.

If noserberg has any shred of integrity, he'll appeal. He doesn't.

How about we arrest the government bureaucrats and throw them in a work camp in Northern Alaska instead?

[–] • 4 pts

I would rather the government not obtain that information. It is a list of dissidents and largely unvaccinated people.

If the government gets this then the people have two problems.

[–] • 2 pts

My mom is on this list. She got a temp ban for talking about my vaccine injuries (old school vax) with a friend in New Zealand. Freaking insane.

[–] • 3 pts

Why does DC want it? Because they are 'protecting' consumers. From the court opinion: "The District is investigating potential violations of the Consumer Protection Procedures Act, or CPPA, D.C.Code §§ 28-3901 to -3913, alleging that Meta has misrepresented to the District’s consumers the degree to which it polices misinformation posted to its platform about the COVID-19 vaccine."

[–] • 1 pt

Sneaky, they can’t go after citizens for this because of 1st amendment protections, so they’re bypassing that by going after private companies with the “District is investigating potential violations of the Consumer Protection Procedures Act, or CPPA” to get them to silence you instead or face government lawsuits and sanctions etc.

[–] • 1 pt

I got ratio’d for telling someone to follow the Facebook rules and not use “hate speech” lol. I love being a liberal on Facebook.

But even with an appeal I’m still ratio’d for quoting their own rules.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Sneaky, they can’t go after citizens for this because of 1st amendment protections, so they’re bypassing that by going after private companies with the “District is investigating potential violations of the Consumer Protection Procedures Act, or CPPA” to get them to silence you instead or face government lawsuits and sanctions etc.

[–] • 1 pt

Misinformation on what particular date? Misinformation often becomes accepted fact if you'd just stfu and give the truth a minute to catch up. My reasoning 'on the fly' is first reports are always wrong. My response usually is 'are they lying on purpose or are they just wrong?' To be cautious, I assume its for nefarious purposes.

[–] • 0 pt

It’s all about scaring companies so they silence you. They don’t care, what or when, only the approved narrative is allowed.