WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

https://unofficialbird.com/ronfergusonohio/status/1506981580811685896

The "might as well get rid of all licenses" group in the comments are retards.

As well as whore

And clean out our lakes of fish? too many greedy fishers take tons of fish and are depleting the stock and size of fish in all our lakes. Permits for everything is needed! People can't make Good choices.period

So stupid she doesn't even realize she contradicted her own argument.

too many greedy fishers take tons of fish and are depleting the stock and size of fish in all our lakes.

We already have permits and licenses and they still do it... I agree on many of the restrictions we have in place, but I do not agree with having to buy an "All species" fishing license just to take your kids to a lake somewhere. Permits should only be required for special circumstances and species.

https://unofficialbird.com/ronfergusonohio/status/1506981580811685896 The "might as well get rid of all licenses" group in the comments are retards. As well as [this](https://unofficialbird.com/ChrisSchlueter1/status/1507464256828047360) whore > And clean out our lakes of fish? too many greedy fishers take tons of fish and are depleting the stock and size of fish in all our lakes. Permits for everything is needed! People can't make Good choices.period So stupid she doesn't even realize she contradicted her own argument. > too many greedy fishers take tons of fish and are depleting the stock and size of fish in all our lakes. We already have permits and licenses and they still do it... I agree on many of the restrictions we have in place, but I do not agree with having to buy an "All species" fishing license just to take your kids to a lake somewhere. Permits should only be required for special circumstances and species.

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

I agree. Who is gonna complain if I empty the Missouri River of carp? No one. If I did that, I would be declared hero. Legally I am required to get a license, but the bag limit for this pest fist is 100 a day.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Every single time

[–] 4 pts

Caught that too; huh?

(((Weinstein)))

[–] 1 pt

Hitler was right. \o

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

I've gotten to the point where I just tell people the allied forces were the bad guys. IDGAF if they don't like it. It also keeps people I don't want to talk to away.

[–] 1 pt

If those guys had known who was really calling the shots and running the US back then, they never would have gotten into those Higgins boats. And the whole of Europe would have been better off for it.

Every time I see a WW2 movie playing, I can't help but look out my window and think, "And look at what all of your misguided, well-meaning efforts produced. Look how it all turned out. The road to hell is clearly paved with good intentions." Thanks jews!

Hitler was right. \o

[–] 4 pts

Simply another example of the government saying you exist, pay me.

[–] 2 pts

Britbong here. The loicense to fish is because its hunting equipment hence it's dangerous. Go on, ask me about loicences.. fucking lol!

[–] 1 pt

Do you have a loicense to talk about loicences?

[–] 1 pt

Permits are only really necessary due to kikes and their shitskin pets

[–] 2 pts

Chinks... nobody can rape land like chinks. Gooks also. a lot of issues with Orientals in California (when I lived there) poaching abalone and various other marine life.

[–] 1 pt

Licenses for harvesting game animals, fishing, collecting wood, have been around for thousands of years. Usually the local lord would do it for economic reasons, to enforce his monopoly, but also to control the depletion rate of the resources. Like it or not, if you are on land that belongs to someone else (government land belongs to some rich Jews, it sucks but whatever), you can’t just do whatever the fuck you want and harvest it’s resource potential for yourself.

Now on the other hand licenses for weapons are a relatively new thing. In very rare circumstances, people would be restricted from owning weapons in history, usually to control them or humiliate them. But a big broad licensing of weapons is very very modern and has no “good” reason behind it.

[–] 0 pt

Restrictions and having to pay just to do something are two different things. Permits and licenses do not stop anyone from breaking the rules. Facts! Never have never will. It's just another tax on your rights. I have my own land. Why do I need to buy one of your cuck licenses?

[–] 1 pt

I disagree. Restrictions and paid circumvention of restrictions go hand in hand.

I will agree with you that licenses or permits to do something on your land or with your resources is a violation of your God-given rights and in fact, theft of God’s gift. If you only own part of a river or part of an oil field, there should be some reasonable quote based on your % share you are allowed to extract.

[–] 0 pt

I think ODNR does a fine job here in the state of Ohio and I personally don't mind my fishing license fee funding their operation.

[–] 0 pt

Someone caught driving intoxicated has done it around 200 times before getting caught once. There was a guy in England that was driving without a license for all his life before he finally got caught.

[–] 0 pt

Licensing in the medical profession and of drugs is what makes it so horrible.

We would have far more advanced healthcare if there were no restrictions on the medical profession, and it was left up to the market to develop the best medical technology and drugs at the lowest price.