It is super wild you think that not only are you less liable to be manipulated, not realizing you are being manipulated by such blatant foolishness but I suppose you will just continue on thoughtlessly. On "faith" lmao.
you will just continue on thoughtlessly
You are wrong. I probably give more thought to these matters than you. You only think I'm a fool because you've witnessed such blatant foolishness with others and their metaphysical beliefs. You've likely only seen it give way to manipulation. But that doesn't mean it always does.
It is obvious though, that you do not give much thought towards your beliefs. Less than anyone except fellow christards or any of the many other brainless follower guiding principles. It ALWAYS is a manipulation. Agnosticism is the only way to not be abjectly wrong. Believers are as smug in their imbecilic ways as any fedora'd atheist.
It is obvious though, that you do not give much thought towards your beliefs
You couldn't possibly know this. In this discussion, we haven't gotten past the definition of our interest in the matter.
What I have told you is that I have given much thought to these matters and find that I have become less manipulatable over the years. You have not asked for example, nor have I given any. Logically, how can you be so certain that I have not given much thought to these matters?
Is it because you have concluded that your beliefs are infallably correct? And thus, any deviation from those beliefs must come from one who does not think? If that is the case, then which of us is truly being "smug in their imbecilic ways"?
(post is archived)