WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

975

Following the emergency response guidebook falls under the guidance category .

The next category says to consider a controlled burn.

They're two separate guidelines for separate types of chemicals.

Following the emergency response guidebook [vinyl chloride](https://pic8.co/d/cc4807b0-ce83-41b6-b857-f717e364e72b.png) falls under the guidance category [116P](https://pic8.co/d/46d8f17c-987b-445f-a92f-9e672b8a524a.png). The next category [(117)](https://pic8.co/d/35f43327-5aea-48d2-a27c-8ec831f8716d.png) says to consider a controlled burn. They're two separate guidelines for separate types of chemicals.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Incompetent or not, a town was "basically nuked". Someone's head should be in a basket over this shit.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

History on a string of train derailments show intentional sabotage. Can't forget about the strings of attacks on power substations not long ago at all. Gross incompetence stacked on top of is very possible.

[–] 2 pts (edited )
[–] 1 pt

Of course it was intentional. It was also grossly incompetent.

[–] 2 pts

It was also grossly incompetent.

It was premeditated. They knew they would have to blow the train after derailing it.

[–] 1 pt

What about the other 3

[–] 3 pts

The other three likewise do not encourage a burn. In every case it says specifically to avoid a fire.

[–] 1 pt

Landing in a town called that? No obviously not.

[–] 1 pt

I mean, it definitely could be.

But if you wanted to destroy a food supply, without pissing off too much of a population, where else would you do it?