I don't know about Florida, but large portions of southern Louisiana would be gone. Look up a place called Houma. The whole fucking town would be swamped if water was 8-9 feet higher.

I didn't know that, and given how they teach history nowadays, probably no one else does either (but you still make an excellent point)

Be careful which data is tossed at you. They have measurements for ice sheet, snowfall, glaciers and others. They only pick the numbers they want to show. "Oh, the glaciers are receding ... climate change!" But what about the other measurements?

According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses - https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

So where's the ice caps? Is probably now snow or ice of one kind or another, and conveniently not in the data they present. But more importantly, it's not flooding Florida or Venice or anywhere else they'd like you to be scared about.

But the glaciers!?!?! Yeah, yeah, don't buy into it. It's the same manipulation as always with everything.

Yah it won’t fly here but the total increase has been 3 inches, and it’s very hard to show that with pictures in massachusettes where the daily tidal variation in water level is from 2-10 feet (south shore has far lower tidal variation than north shore).

Facebook said...

Wow really? Derp

Probably because it has three images combined into one. And you can't put text on a photo without digitally altering it. Use your head.