Long and serious article. And mostly, neutral..... moderate, without explicit attack on jews. Honestly I don't read entire article, I will read it when have more time. "Problem" with your article is that he is not really antisemitic, so THEY can't debunk it easy. When THEY are faced with facts they cannot refute, THEIR tactic is censorship. Otherwise, if you just spill hate based on personal animosity, they probably will keep article and use it as just one prove of global systematic racism. Old game, and THEY master it.
And mostly, neutral..... moderate, without explicit attack on jews.
Which is what makes it so good, and why I felt this post did not break Phuk's ToS.
This article does not break the following ToS. There is no hate or call to violence. This simply analyzes behavior and reflects its impact towards current culture.
(post is archived)