WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

I was reading an article from in which Naturalnews made the claim that Stanford says butchering and harvesting blood and organs from children can help adults achieve “immortality”. So, naturally I clicked the link, it was a catchy title and I wanted to see the source info for this claim. As it turns out, this story gave a classic example of how propaganda really works.

Let's break this Propaganda piece down

  • Natural news makes the claim, Stanford says butchering and harvesting blood and organs from children can help adults achieve “immortality
  • Natural news cites as the source AND - which is nothing more than a fear pushing joke of a website.
  • Newspunch cites the , as the source of the information as well as a
  • Now if you to the Telegraphs page you will find that every single link on their page, including everything they claim to be a source of information does nothing but link to other articles on their own site.

This is how the round-a-bout of fake news is really generated and all this is most likely paid for with American tax dollars.

So the claim that Stanford says butchering and harvesting blood and organs from children can help adults achieve “immortality" is literally based on an article three sources deep and is derived from the statement “infusing cerebrospinal fluid of young mice into old mice improves brain function”.

Let's now see how this ripples across the internet. I decided to actually access google (sorry about that) and see how many other articles used and I received 9 titles all using the same information. The top hit was the Miamistandard.news - sounds reputable right?

their source? Natural News AND NEWSPUNCH!!!!!

LMFAO

The next site on the list...Newstarget sourcing both naturalnews and newspunch.

DO YOU SEE IT NOW???????????

If you do, start to read who they source and it will tell you all you need to know. This is just a bullshit piece to get you riled up.

EDIT: Here is an identical example with the NY Post from another common poster. Same round about, sourcing only their own articles and adding captions to photos with credits. There is no source of information for you to get except theirs.

I was reading an article from [this post](https://poal.co/s/QStorm/537830) in which Naturalnews made the claim that Stanford says butchering and harvesting blood and organs from children can help adults achieve “immortality”. So, naturally I clicked the link, it was a catchy title and I wanted to see the source info for this claim. As it turns out, this story gave a classic example of how propaganda really works. ####Let's break this Propaganda piece down - Natural news makes the claim, Stanford says butchering and harvesting blood and organs from children can help adults achieve “immortality - Natural news cites [Newspunch](https://newspunch.com/stanford-university-harvesting-blood-organs-of-children-could-help-achieve-immortality/) as the source AND [organharvesting.news](organharvesting.news/) - which is nothing more than a fear pushing joke of a website. - Newspunch cites the [Telegraph](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/05/14/stanford-scientists-discover-youth-transplants-reverse-ageing/), as the source of the information as well as a [Summit news piece](https://summit.news/2022/05/17/new-research-shows-harvesting-blood-body-parts-of-the-young-could-help-achieve-immortality/) - Now if you to the Telegraphs page you will find that every single link on their page, including everything they claim to be a source of information does nothing but link to other articles on their own site. This is how the round-a-bout of fake news is really generated and all this is most likely paid for with American tax dollars. So the claim that Stanford says butchering and harvesting blood and organs from children can help adults achieve “immortality" is literally based on an article three sources deep and is derived from the statement “infusing cerebrospinal fluid of young mice into old mice improves brain function”. Let's now see how this ripples across the internet. I decided to actually access google (sorry about that) and see how many other articles used [the identical title in their news pieces](https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Stanford%20says%20butchering%20and%20harvesting%20blood%20and%20organs%20from%20children%22) and I received 9 titles all using the same information. The top hit was the Miamistandard.news - sounds reputable right? [Article Miami Standard-->](https://miamistandard.news/2022/05/20/stanford-says-butchering-and-harvesting-blood-and-organs-from-children-can-help-adults-achieve-immortality/) their source? Natural News AND NEWSPUNCH!!!!! ###LMFAO The next site on the list...Newstarget sourcing both naturalnews and newspunch. DO YOU SEE IT NOW??????????? If you do, start to read who they source and it will tell you all you need to know. This is just a bullshit piece to get you riled up. EDIT: Here is an identical example with the NY Post from another common poster. Same round about, sourcing only their own articles and adding captions to photos with credits. There is no source of information for you to get except theirs. [Poal post](https://nypost.com/2022/05/19/how-fbi-bigwig-aided-and-abetted-hillary-clinton-plot) [Original](https://nypost.com/2022/05/19/how-fbi-bigwig-aided-and-abetted-hillary-clinton-plot/)

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

While most on this site know this already or say they do, how many people go through the process as I listed out? Hardly anyone, and it took me a while of 3 minutes to do so.

I started to tell you nice leg work and breakdown. Didn't for some reason. As you've raised the point, it's applicable. Nice job.

[–] 1 pt

I updated the post (couldn't leave for work till i did and it took me a matter of 2 seconds by clicking new lol) with another typical poal poster and his nypost article, but regardless of how anyone feels about the post - all other media outlets do the same thing less a few stories that are true.

[–] 1 pt

thanks, and you bring up a more valid point. I should do this with a mainstream article and some scientific journals when i get back from work today.

I actually have a story I've been working on for a little while, i'll publish parts of it here as it is applicable to what we are talking about.