Again, this discussion has nothing to do with the business dynamics of this deal. This is about Musk giving large sums to money to people he claims to oppose. Nobody is forcing him to do anything.
You tried saying he had no choice but to secure this contract with glencore because it was in the best interest of his investors. That's debatable. There's also a ton of liability that comes with dealing with glencore. Do the benefits outweigh the risk? Probably. I'll give you that.
I guess I'll just have to keep an eye on this for the time being until I have further evidence to corroborate what I'm saying. At the end of the day, he's still following cash to MOSSAD though.
>This is about Musk giving large sums to money to people he claims to oppose. Nobody is forcing him to do anything.
Wrong. Musk HAS TO secure large quantities of cobalt at the best price, whether he likes it or not, because that's how it works
Retard
We're having a circular argument. Glencore isn't the only cobalt supplier in the world. That's why you shifted your argument to them being the best supplier of cobalt in the world, which is debatable. I don't know enough about mining to weigh in on that and I doubt you do either.
Glencore isn't the only cobalt supplier in the world.
It's the biggest by a LARGE margin, and therefore the best positioned to offer the best prices, duh!
>Glencore is the world’s largest cobalt-mining company by a long shot, achieving estimated total production of 25,320 metric tonnes (MT) in 2021. Near-term growth in output is expected from the company’s operations in the DRC; this includes increased cobalt production at the Mutanda mine restart and at Katanga.
Retard
(post is archived)