I did prove you wrong. Provided a link. Provided a citation available from dozens of search results from lawyers' web sites. Easy to reproduce. Your dishonesty of it only characterizes you. But nice projection you have going on there.
Wah... wah...
Since you only want to project and cry while standing on a shill hill, I'll leave you be.
Not one thing in that article pointed to a law. That's not proof of anything. It's all just talk.
Now you are confusing "case law" with actual "law". Not the same. If there is no Law it's not illegal.
(post is archived)