Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

185

Facebook’s Zuckercuck recently said he hopes that users stop thinking of Facebook as a social media company and more of a metaverse company.

What in the tarnation brought about this recent obsession with 'metaverse'(&does it have to do anything with possible social credit score system that might come along with the 'great 2030 communist reset') ? How many companies are going to have a kick at the can for this?

Reminds me of the Sony Blueray/Toshiba HdDvd battle. Before that the Sony/Nintendo solid state/optical media battle, & I wasn't there for it, but wayy back was the (beta?)/VHS battle.

Facebook hoping you'd forget that Facebook is Facebook. Like wtf! If rebranding & starting from scratch would be possible without losing your base, logging in with ***.com would have dissappeared at least ten years ago.

Facebook doing some kind of metaverse will turn it into what windows OS was before it got some real competition. Just a big fat bloat of a disaster OS.

Zuck the fat.

> Facebook’s Zuckercuck recently said he hopes that users stop thinking of Facebook as a social media company and more of a metaverse company. What in the tarnation brought about this recent obsession with 'metaverse'(&does it have to do anything with possible social credit score system that might come along with the 'great 2030 communist reset') ? How many companies are going to have a kick at the can for this? Reminds me of the Sony Blueray/Toshiba HdDvd battle. Before that the Sony/Nintendo solid state/optical media battle, & I wasn't there for it, but wayy back was the (beta?)/VHS battle. Facebook hoping you'd forget that Facebook is Facebook. Like wtf! If rebranding & starting from scratch would be possible without losing your base, logging in with ***@Hotmail.com would have dissappeared at least ten years ago. Facebook doing some kind of metaverse will turn it into what windows OS was before it got some real competition. Just a big fat bloat of a disaster OS. Zuck the fat.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 1 pt

who gives a shit if cuckbook gets 'taken over'? Its already a massive shitshow, the only thing left there is to slowly & painstakingly try to show your 'friends' the truth about this fucking large-scale deception we've all been duped into. Slow & painstaking because their algos are really limiting your reach inside the platform.

Good riddance if it finally gets 'taken over', & now also with this 'meta' bullshit, they are going to try to integrate cuckbook into 'something new' & much larger than cuckbook, & cuckbook +whatever 'metasphere' that zucercuck design is going to be cumbersome as fk, because he is forced to design a meta verse to make it backwards compatible with his censorship-abortion of a social network.

I think this next step is going to corral a lot of users unto alternative social networks.

/rant

well shit now I need to look up yet another bullshit omidyar/project antitrust happening. Too many things to keep track of. IS there an article somewhere where it puts it all into perspective?

[–] • 0 pt

also with this 'meta' bullshit, they are going to try to integrate cuckbook into 'something new' & much larger than cuckbook, & cuckbook

Exactly - and that's why we should care of it's taken over. If we think the censorship's bad now, we haven't seen anything yet. \

Believe me, I get your rant - actually wish more people were ranting - we're ignoring this stuff, and it WILL bite us in the rear - bc what's going to happen, is it will be implemented - and once that happens - it's over, They'll move us into cashless, and will have complete control.

Sadly, not many write about PO. He flies under the radar and is quite protected. His network is huge, and I suspect some may start getting into it and then just say "f---- it - too much." The other problem is people want info in twitter-sized (very effective training they've done there, BTW) bites. It's impossible to explain this network in a sentence or two, and it's set up very effectively in that if you look at only a part or two of the network it looks quite innocuous - even good.

We're talking hundreds and hundreds of NGOs - He's technically transparent but in an opaque way, if you get my meaning.

[–] • 1 pt

Is this supposed to be a replacement for the