There are actually biologically inherent reasons governed by genetics that these things are occurring and while explaining this is sort of tedious, I could give it a shot if you'd like.
Whites are smarter and therefore more competent. This means they need to buy few genetic lottery tickets in order to have their genes move on. Nogs are dumber and therefore less competent, meaning they need to buy more genetic lottery tickets in order for their genes to move on. A big reason for importation of ferals is the need to have more and cheaper workers. You can thank the boomers and their retarded parents for this, who are the reason for outsourcing of manufacturing, which they then reimport to us... giving our jobs to other countries. Then we let women work, who voted for welfare and more ferals...
There's more to this. I could explain more if you want.
This is correct. It is also why blacks have a rape reproductive strategy and whites do not.
Do it. I love reading it. Please?
Selection pressures have morphed over time. It used to just be about who's big and strong. In the technical age, things have differed a bit. Clearly women still want big and strong men and men still want youthful women with a golden hip to waist ratio. But there's more to it now. The "genetic brain" of our species now also accounts for population numbers in given geographical locations. The overarching anthropological/biological theory for this is fascinating, but I don't recall where to point you to in order to hear more or remember enough of the details to lay it all out succinctly, but I can give it a whirl:
Total Resources + Resource Refining - Consumption + Rate of Resource Renewal = Given Population of a Particular Geographical Area
The amount of resources and the geographical placement are predominant contributors to size and orientation of a population. If you put a species of highly competent (intelligent) individuals in a resource rich environment, they'll inevitably have less kids over time, mostly for reasons I already explained (see above: "lottery tickets"). This effects rates at which manufacturing can be conducted, which affects local economies, which effects demographics, all of which contribute to particular birth rates. This is why our ancestors always had slaves. There were always fewer royalty than subjects. The relationship used to be much more symbiotic than parasitic. No matter how you look at the current dynamic, it's offset. But you can read more about the realities of feudalism on your own.
Feel free to ask more questions.
(post is archived)