It is not the court's job to "defend the constitution." It is the courts job to enforce the laws as written and ensure those laws are constitutional. Yes. Courts in the past have gone above and beyond their authority to entertain cases and make rulings and judgments that they have no business doing. That's called "legislating from the bench" and they have no actual authority to do so. And, what those who feel cheated are asking the courts to do now is the job of the state's executive branch, and the courts aren't permitted to do that, either. Prior to the election, no one had standing because, Prior to the election, there was no harmed party in a position to make the claim. After the EC vote, nothing matters. The EC picked the president IAW each state's laws and the constitution. There was nothing to challenge. The votes were cast as each state demanded, the EC votes were counted accurately, Biden won. The time between election night and the EC vote was the critical time, but has nothing to do with the federal court system. It's a state's issue. Was state laws broken? Who, specifically, broke which specific laws? And other than the PA challenge to a change in voting laws, which the PA Supreme Court did address and decide in favor of the allowed change, which state court ignored a suit filed by a party with standing citing specific violations of state law?