>would there be a case? Not really, which was why it was a stupid move from his defense. I haven't followed it closely, and certainly don't know the ins and outs, but I think the police were called and they were trying to detain him until they got there...or they were calling them?? Not real sure. Either way, they attempted to detain him and he attacked. Self-defense shooting. They fucked up by saying they were trying to citizens arrest him, but that was tossed out by the judge. Now they're stuck having admitted to detain a free person, which is kidnapping. Ahmed Robbery now has the right to fight to attempt to flee, and they shot him. Those two are fucked. My non-lawyer and armchair drive-by-spectator analysis. Take it for what it's worth.