![Runes and their Meaning [410x771 - 94KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/8eGI3f.png){kind=link}
The U.S. has environmental conservation laws and a whole agency devoted to its preservation and they do a shit job. Why the hell would you want the government, which lacks the incentive and the resources to protect the environment, to have authority over it? What a stupid idea. Central planners always think they're smart enough to direct a country to utopia and yet every single time, they cause death, destruction, and misery all around them.
Hunting laws and regulations are a huge exception to what you just said. Many habitats and species have been restored specifically because of these laws. Not everything is black and white
They're not a huge exception at all. Just because the government is sometimes effective, does not mean that it didn't use an excessive amount of resources in doing so. If it takes the government $10 million to do something that the private sector could have done with $1 million, then $9 million was wasted. And who gets to determine which habitats and species get saved and which are left to go extinct?
The solution, of course, is obvious.
So your solution is to let corporations protect/restore the environment? Are you even listening to yourself?
Yes the solution is obvious, lobotomies for retards
https://www.mdwfp.com/conservation/who-pays-for-it/pittman-robertson-act.aspx
(post is archived)