WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Everything is fake and bull shit. It is your job to see it and tell others.

Everything is fake and bull shit. It is your job to see it and tell others.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

If we allow CO2 levels to drop much lower it will cause an extinction event. It would destroy plants much as sugar has destroyed cognitive function of the climate activists and supporters.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

If we allow CO2 levels to drop

ugh... here's a chart of historical CO2 levels, have a wild guess what's likely to happen in the next 50 years...

do you really think we are going to see any sudden drops in that fucking line?

let's go back a bit

[–] 1 pt

Those charts are extremely dishonest and deceiving.

They are computer models and all are political and the variation is immense and it's 500 years in the future where we may reach half the level of the triassic.

But how about climate models start being accurate before we start believing them?

Sounds reasonable.

How about we take away financial reward for studies proving mm climate change? Remove conflict of interest is rational.

And finally. Let's get peer reviewed proof that politicians can stagnate global climate before destroying our liberty and prosperity in their name.

But we all know no such proof exists or ever will

[–] 2 pts

Accurate models, ha. Ain’t gonna happen. Even the best models use constants where variables ought to be. In the short term the effect is negligible, but compound errors are a hell of a thing.

[–] 1 pt

Wait, I thought the models were only good for 12 years, when the entire northern seaboard was devastated in 2007. Good job people, crisis averted, now pack it up and go home.

[–] -1 pt

They are computer models and all are political

we measure historical CO2 by drilling core samples out of ice, politics has nothing to do with it

But how about climate models start being accurate before we start believing them?

how about we plan for the extinction level event first, and then worry about the degree of precision later?

How about we take away financial reward for studies proving mm climate change?

OK, but first take away the financial reward for oil companies continuing to accelerate the issue. I guarantee you they have more money and political power

Let's get peer reviewed proof that politicians can stagnate global climate before destroying our liberty and prosperity in their name

Where did you get the idea that it's us versus the politicians? it's us versus the oil companies who are lobbying the politicians to kick the can down the road till 2050. "peer reviewed proof", but you just said all research was biased? (without any proof of that either)