Your analogy is faulty. The question wasn't "how much CO2 in the atmosphere is too much." The question was "do you know much CO2 there is in the atmosphere."
Your analogy is faulty. The question wasn't "how much CO2 in the atmosphere is too much." The question was "do you know much CO2 there is in the atmosphere."
It's not my analogy it's OPs. Secondly, it's spot on. Thirdly to address your statement specifically I said this, "So you say how many are released when U235 is split and again they say "I'm not a scientist I don't know"."
It's not my analogy it's OPs. Secondly, it's spot on. Thirdly to address your statement specifically I said this, "So you say how many are released when U235 is split and again they say "I'm not a scientist I don't know"."
Secondly, it's spot on.
Why don't you describe to us what you think makes an analogy valid versus invalid.
> Secondly, it's spot on.
Why don't you describe to us what you think makes an analogy valid versus invalid.
(post is archived)