WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

541

Serious question.

You niggers hate on flat earth yet when I disprove your shitty globalist faith you get pissed at me.

Post your top 1. Best argument for a globalist earth and let’s settle it it. I was a genius two years ago when I was a globalist and the moment when I questioned the globalist earth model I became a moron.

So let’s do it. A former genius vs a current modern day globalist; what’s your argument? Why do you believe in globalism?

Serious question. You niggers hate on flat earth yet when I disprove your shitty globalist faith you get pissed at me. Post your top 1. Best argument for a globalist earth and let’s settle it it. I was a genius two years ago when I was a globalist and the moment when I questioned the globalist earth model I became a moron. So let’s do it. A former genius vs a current modern day globalist; what’s your argument? Why do you believe in globalism?

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts (edited )

its disproven with the naked eye, you wannabe jewish loon.

[–] 6 pts

I am disguested with those who keep pushing the "flat earth" absurdity because our society has enough irrationality in it already -- we don't need any more. The liberal fascists have given us enough illogic to last a decade, at least. The global warming crowd and the vaccine advocates have provided far more irrationality than we can cope with in our lifetimes. There are too many nuts saying too many nutty things.

[–] 0 pt

I'm disgusted with faggots that believe in Earth

[–] 1 pt

I’m disgusted by faggots

[–] 6 pts

We use satellites for GPS navigation which has never been explained in a flat earth model.

The flat earthers can never explain satellites (artificial and natural ones)

[–] 0 pt

95% of all communication comes from cables.

The other 5% are based on radio towers, which essentially is what “gps” is. It’s just a frequency of radio. As for alleged satellites in space. There’s a ton of evidence they are balloons.

[–] 2 pts

Explain how a balloon can stay stationary in one spot like a satellite can for decades. The old C-band and KU-band satellite TV systems relied on the satellites being stationary relative to Earth and in a specific arc at the equator. I setup several C-band satellite dishes in the 80s and I guarantee you that you must be pointed directly at the satellite in order to catch its signal. Any bit off in any direction and you get nothing. There are mathematical formulas for figuring out where you should align your dish based on your latitude and inclination considering the satellites are 22,500 miles away.

Balloons, yeah that's the stupidest excuse for why FE can't explain satellites away.

[–] 0 pt

Explain how satellites are an economically sound venture vs ground based towers?

Doesn’t make sense. You are a boomer and believe we landed on the moon, you ever watch the final nasa launch from the moon? You see the confetti?

[–] 1 pt

Since there is a ton of evidence that highly sophisticated satellites are simply balloons, I'm confused as to why you didn't post any evidence?

[–] 0 pt

Google deletes it. Just like google deleted the fact that employees walked out of Southwest Airlines jobs due to the vaxxx and they blamed it on the weather. You Are a troll. You are not this dumb dumb dumb

[–] 4 pts

Personally I find flat earthers quite interesting (though naturally you are wrong because the world is actually a hollow tube full of spiders).

Regardless, if you'd like to present a map of flat Earth I'll be happy to point out why that particular model doesn't work through publicly available data and simple mathematics that most folks with an income and some vacation days should be able to check if they actually gave a shit.

First question would be: Are you capable of walking in a straight line?

Test: Take a compass to confirm you are heading East or West, walk/drive/fly in a completely straight line for N thousand miles without changing your heading.

Expected results: Flatworld: You are orienting around a central pole, therefore your compass will show you have changed your heading has changed and you are no longer heading East or West despite having travelled in a straight line. Roundworld: You are orienting around an oblate spheroid, travelling any amount of distance East or West in a straight line will lead to you arriving at your origin point and your compass heading will remain static throughout.

Alternative: You are actually incapable of travelling in a straight line and instead list naturally towards the pole that is "central" on the disc. Your brain is also literally incapable of determining if something is straight and will interpret mildly curved objects as being straight as an arrow.

[–] 3 pts

man i live in australia right. ive been to europe myself so i know i can fly direct from australia to the uk

i know people who have flown direct to LA, so you can fly from AUS to the US.

i know people in the UK who have flown from the UK to new york so i know you can do that.

So presumably there is some kind of north/south running land border dividing the US, cos it sure as shit aint on this side of the planet.

Now i also know that i can book a pleasure cruise down to antarctica and that place exists with no sekrit navy guarding some massive ice wall but ill pretend thats there for the purpose of this flat earth scenario, so, where is the northern border which presumably exists somewhere north of canada russia and all that shit?

So flat earthers either live on a pacman plane where they disappear out one side and appear on the other, or a cylinder word.

And if yes to either of those... then why the fuck not a globe, especially when you dont have to explain why all the parts of the model dont argue with each other

[–] 1 pt

Australian, eh? I assume you're already well acquainted with "hollow and full of spiders" view of the Earth then.

Yeah, the entire flatworld model doesn't seem to work very well when you remember that people actually live in the Southern Hemisphere and can travel to destinations in both the Northern hemisphere and Southern hemisphere without any appreciable difference in travel time whether they're going east/west or north/south.

Presumably you're allowed to visit Antarctica because all Australians are part of the conspiracy already?

[–] 1 pt

Something like that :)

New Zealand is fake tho.

[–] 2 pts

A. what a coincidence. Obviously you know coincidences don’t exist.

B. Nobody is capable of walking in a straight line, though the question begs this, “if straight lines are possible why has the South Pole never been flown over and circumnavigated from pole to pole? You don’t have an answer because it’s illegal.

C. Oh, just read the rest of your example. You don’t know anything about flat earth. You can walk east to west. What you can’t do son, is walk north to south because it’s illegal. Trust the science

D. Your gotcha question is low IQ which I caught immediately. Try again, remember I was a GENIUS globalist just two years ago, no way could I become a moron in just two years simply for asking questions.

E. You don’t even know why you believe in Globalism, you just watched one too many Hollywood pedophile movies

[–] 4 pts

A: Cool, thanks. You agree based on this map the minimum distance between South Africa and Australia is more than double the distance between South Africa and Britain?

B: Okay, so you believe that nobody is capable of walking in (or presumably seeing) straight lines? That's interesting. So if I stuck a hundred meter long rulers end to end, would it seem curved to you? How many do I need to stack before it starts to curve? Does this only happen to you when you walk West or East? Or does it happen when you try to walk North?

C: To the contrary, it seems impossible not to walk north or south in a flat earth model unless, as you claim, people are incapable of the simple act of walking in a straight line. Any straight line with a starting direction perpendicular to the pole would inevitably result in someone travelling South-East or South-West. The only possible straight line would be travelling directly north or south.

D: I haven't asked a gotcha question. So far I've asked if you were capable of walking in a straight line and proposed an experiment you could easily take to prove or disprove your worldview.

E: I don't watch television. Have you ever considered that maybe part of the negativity you encounter is a result of you being needlessly aggressive?

[–] 4 pts

Who cares?

[–] 2 pts

Well you do. How embarrassing is it that you believe in the same shit as fauchi? You’re a globalist. “Muh moon landing!” How Brain dead do you have to be to have faith in a moon landing in 1969 when we can’t do the same thing 50 years later???

How retarded do you have to be???

Simple question. Why do you believe in globalism?

[–] 4 pts

Why do you think I believe in Globalism?

[–] 2 pts

Because you said “who cares.” Words matter. You are a globalist, I remember you from the old site (you remember me too) words matter.

You are either a globalist or you are not

[–] 0 pt

the moon and sun in the sky are clearly large circles or spheres. Not flat planks. Why would Earth be any different?

[–] 0 pt

Why play basketball on a flat floor?

[–] 0 pt

Why is a basketball round but the court flat? It’s a silly question. Fact is the argument fir a flat earth is just as sound as a globalist one. This is well admitted. We just chose to follow the globalist model. Problem is once you start picking apart globalism you realize it’s a lie. Every assumption is based on myth and theory not laws or facts.

Every observation and engineering test proves we are stationary.

[–] 3 pts

Yes, people shouldnt hate Flat earth. It's the best part for farming, everyone who eats should be grateful for flat earth. Mountains are a waste of space. If not for flat earth, land speed records would be lower and low land speed records are a sign that a society is retarded.

[–] 2 pts

Good rhetoric: now how many nukes does Israel have?

[–] 1 pt

Dont know, how many nukes does the US have. Because that would be the correct answer to your question.

[–] 0 pt

Oh stop it Goat.

Nukes don’t exist

[–] 0 pt

All of them exept the ones in NK.

[–] 0 pt

Lol! You don't believe in globe Earth, but you believe nukes are real! Top kek!

[–] 0 pt

Nukes aren’t real. And JFK never died. Do you not read history? How dumb dumb dumb are you??

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Because it simply isn't true. We've wasted so much time arguing with you faggots over the years. Not going to give you time and walls of text, you're not worth it.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

Because it is completely contrary to what one can observe by simply spending time outside. It is mental illness.

Maybe go outside during the next lunar eclipse...when you can literally see a sphere floating in the sky after a shadow from the earth (because the sun is on the other side of it) covers the moon and allows you to see it for what it is. How does that happen in Flat Earth world? Explain the phases of the moon and the seasons.

[–] 0 pt

Explain why the shadow of the moon during an eclipse is only 30miles wide when the moon is 2,000 miles on diameter. It’s scientifically impossible for the shadow of an object to be 1% the size of said object. Impossible.

Speaking of the moon, haven’t you thought it odd when you see the full moon in the middle of the day occasionally? Shouldn’t be possible according to the globalist model, yet it happens frequently

[–] 1 pt
  1. it isn't
  2. when has that happened?

answering questions with questions with made-up premises is not a good look.

[–] 0 pt

It is

Happens multiple times a year. You don’t pay attention.

Again I was a genius when I was a globalist. Problem is I asked questions. How do you not ask questions?

[–] 2 pts

Why do you let this troll waste the most valuable commodity that you have? Your time?

[–] 0 pt

What the fuck else we gonna do with the whole no jqb no job shit.

[–] 0 pt

People waste time: this is a good hinbg

[–] 2 pts

i have no idea if ive ever read any of your posts but i already know you havent proven shit

[–] 2 pts

Y’all are some dumb mother fuckers.

Load more (5 replies)