, the reason is that domain was spammed frequently by a now banned spammer.
@dontbeaphaggot, the reason is that domain was spammed frequently by a now banned spammer.
Does that make it a bad domain, or just one that unfortunately was abused…. If the user was associated with it I’m some sort of annoying self promotion I see that, but if it wasn’t that looks like killed by friendly fire.
Does that make it a bad domain, or just one that unfortunately was abused…. If the user was associated with it I’m some sort of annoying self promotion I see that, but if it wasn’t that looks like killed by friendly fire.
Does that make it a bad domain, or just one that unfortunately was abused
Either are grounds for a ban. Some domains have their own shills.
>Does that make it a bad domain, or just one that unfortunately was abused
Either are grounds for a ban. Some domains have their own shills.
So if I spam links to a site, I can get it censored? And the only cost is nuking my acct?
So if I spam links to a site, I can get it censored? And the only cost is nuking my acct?
(post is archived)