No it's not. You're insisting that it exists because scientists say so. I'm saying I don't trust them. Are you one of those autists that doesn't accept anything outside of peer reviewed circle jerk science journals? Do I have to publish a study to have an opinion?
Alright, so I have to explain why
>If it was real I would have caught it by now. I have taken zero precautions going on a year and a half now.
Just because you didn't catch it, doesn't prove it doesn't exist.
Just because you're a lifelong smoker and didn't get a lung cancer as a result doesn't prove lung cancer doesn't exist or that smoking doesn't increase risks to get a lung cancer. Same deal.
>Do I have to publish a study to have an opinion?
As far as I'm concerned, you can have an opinion backed by nothing but a belief, on any given topic
Just don't ask me to consider your belief as a scientific fact that's all
You're just talking to yourself at this point not actually having an exchange. Congrats on being super special.
Projecting much?
I'm still waiting for you to demonstrate that sars-cov-2 doesn't exist. And no, just because you didn't catch it isn't a valid demonstration by any standard.
(post is archived)