Not that I'd ever eat their shitty food, but it's really stupid to expect to find a specific fishes DNA in a vat of highly processed, cooked meat. DNA falls apart during cooking and processing.
I believe they use tuna. I just believe they process the fuck out of it until its unrecognizable as tuna. Gross either way, but there's a huge difference.
Nope. If dna can be extracted from bones burned in a fire or that of a drowned person, they can absolutely tell you if the tuna is real. Don’t be such an NPC. “Oh, they have a big pot they process it in so it takes out the dna” (no Neil the nigger scientist it doesn’t).
Do your research, the idiot reporter sent a sample of tuna salad off to a local lab that typically deals with blood, saliva, and other generally isolated fluids. NO DNA was found. Not the wrong DNA. NO DNA.
Why? Processing and heat. Fucking research DNA degradation. As soon as a cell dies, DNA begins to degrade. Soft tissue degrades faster. Hard tissues like bones and teeth degrade far slower. Beyond that, the process and technology used at the local lab were nothing like what is used at a university studying ancient DNA.
This is clickbait fakenews. You are the NPC.
Yep, seems to me Subway has a slander lawsuit primed against the Times here and they should do it to stop this fake news.
(post is archived)