![DRUG FREE [1080x1080 - 119KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/a6q3cG.jpg){kind=link}
So we are giving away money but giving away another few bucks isn't worth it?
Yes it is.
so you dont mind being taxes to pay for drug testing randomly for alcohol and twice a month urine?
because i'll tell you what, that will cost more than food assistance
yuo dont know what you are talking about, go look up the cost
Not to mention, what happens to their 4 nigglets when they fail the drug test and stop getting welfare? state care? yeh, thats gonna cost way more than the welfare itself
I'd these guys can do it for 4 bucks, I'd say you are looking at the markup. https://www.americanscreeningcorp.com/drug-testing/reveal-10-panel-cup-thc-coc-amp-opi-mamp-pcp-bar-bzo-mtd-oxy.asp?network=g&device=m&keyword=&campaign=8707000226&adgroup=pla-837416496935&gclid=Cj0KCQjwzYGGBhCTARIsAHdMTQxiMHuripZMow7oaHQafeMtllU7MFIe9eQjUEbloHZnd-uramWbKYsaAsi8EALw_wcB
those are home tests, awwwww dont think so. those are what parents buy to test their kids if they have a drug problem.
a standard 5 panel UA usually around 30 to 50$ that doesn't have alcohol. Pot, benzo, opiate, blah blah
alcohol monitoring is like 10 dollars a day
anything other than that is useless because you can cheat on them. and those strips for alcohol are only if you been drinking prior to taking.
instead of monitoring, you could do ETG test but would need to be twice a month random as well those are like 50$ a test but cheaper than monitoring.
so, yeah that is just for one person, anything less than what probation does is just pointless to do because you can work around it.
so you see how retarded this argument is yet? and drug testing is just fucking stupid.
if anything I see this somehow working is if you personally report to a person and see what you are up to and that person observes you acting weird or something can ask you for a test.
but even that would be stupid expensive given the number of people using it.
They tried this in Florida IIRC. The enforcement program ended up costing more than the funding they recovered from people they kicked out of the program, so they stopped it. IIRC again, the percentage of violators was single digits.
So the answer to your question is evidently no.
(post is archived)