WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 12 pts

No. Don't give out free money. But if you do give out free money, don't come along later and start adding stipulations to control people with it. That's a jew thing to do.

[–] 7 pts

Bullshit, if I'm paying the food bill there shouldn't be any sugar drinks or chips accepted on that card.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Or any luxury food item for that matter. What a slap in the face when I'm eating rice and beans while some asshole walks by with a fat food stamp steak.

[–] 1 pt

Bullshit, if I'm paying the food bill there shouldn't be any sugar drinks or chips accepted on that card.

How then will the healthcare industry make money if there's nobody to keep sick?

[–] 0 pt

Okay, control freak. Coming soon, no meat. Eat the bugs, goy. Your definition of "junk food" won't be the standard.

[–] 0 pt

If another man is paying for your food, you have no stand to complain when bugs are the main stable. You don't like it, WORK!

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

there is nothing wrong with social services as long as it is not abused

[–] 7 pts

There is when it is government controlled. What starts out as, here is some rice and beans, turns into here is $1,000 a month in food stamps.

[–] 3 pts

Literally the fat unemployed nigger who lives next to me just bragged about getting nearly $1000 in EBT just an hour ago. Meanwhile I'm out of work because I got bursitis at my job where I still worked the 2 weeks I had a pulled muscle in my back from lifting something too heavy off a bottom shelf (where it shouldn't have been stored anyway because of its weight and the risk of back injury).

[–] [deleted] -3 pt (edited )

show me where its 1000/month for food stamps please

because my state its like 100 per person, and i dont know about you... but i couldnt survive on 25/week

[–] 3 pts

Yes there is. Taking money from one person against their will and using it to the benefit of another is inexcusable and always immoral.

[–] [deleted] -3 pt

no, thats why it called a social service to help people in need. part in reason why everyone and companies pay taxes.

dont try to give me some soapbox bla blah gov'nt aint no rights to tax me

reread what i wrote and understand it, its only one fucking sentence ffs

[–] [deleted] -4 pt (edited )

also, you must not like paved roads then, or utilites

do you just want to poo in a outhouse... I mean if that want by all means go for it

[–] 2 pts

WRONG!

Welfare destroys economic information.

You want a system that marries productive economic behavior to compensation. Any time you take by threat of imprisionment money from a productive person and give it to a non productive one, you are undermining money as an information system of economic behavior.

You are just creating a niche which beggars will learn to exploit. Like feeding racoons. People are like racoons. Dont feed one or you will have 20 in your garbage next week

You want money to be as reliable an information system as possible and for it to represent real work, useful goods and services. Welfare is data corruption

blah blah blah

learn to fucking read parrot

[–] 1 pt

It's literally always abused.

[–] 1 pt

social services IS abuse

that doesnt really say anything, other than you parrot other people

[–] 4 pts

It's not about making a compassionate, effective, and sensible policy.

It's about stealing wealth from whites so they can afford to have fewer children and transferring that wealth to shitskins so they can afford to breed like flies on refuse and replace you.

The shitskin's numbers swell and so their voting power increases and they vote for even more corrupt and evil politicians who escalate the white genocide.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts (edited )

are you going to pay for their drug testing? or do you think that is just free? will they have drug test testing cards? who is going to transport them? will it be random testing?

no one ever mentions this, its not free to drug test people. But hey it sounds good on the internet

[–] 1 pt

So we are giving away money but giving away another few bucks isn't worth it?

Yes it is.

so you dont mind being taxes to pay for drug testing randomly for alcohol and twice a month urine?

because i'll tell you what, that will cost more than food assistance

yuo dont know what you are talking about, go look up the cost

[–] 1 pt

Not to mention, what happens to their 4 nigglets when they fail the drug test and stop getting welfare? state care? yeh, thats gonna cost way more than the welfare itself

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

They tried this in Florida IIRC. The enforcement program ended up costing more than the funding they recovered from people they kicked out of the program, so they stopped it. IIRC again, the percentage of violators was single digits.

So the answer to your question is evidently no.

[–] 3 pts

Drugs should be legal. We don't need a nanny state.

[–] 1 pt

Exactly, it should be drug tests for no one. People arguing for drug tests for all are assholes

[–] 2 pts

ITT : lazy potheads don't want to lose their free money.

[–] 2 pts

Turning Jew USA

GAY

[–] 1 pt

No drug laws.

No welfare.

Private charities did the job before and did it better.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

"I have an idea, lets take away the little money drug addicts get. this surely wont result in even more crime in our country that's falling apart from crime"

[–] 0 pt

I have an idea, let's give drug addicts even more money because they sell their EBT to the dealers who resell it to niggers in the projects.

[–] 1 pt

We stopped drug testing awhile ago.

Load more (11 replies)