They are a psy op in the sense that they exist to make everyone believe that leaks happen and aren't controlled and the "truth gets out, someday." This is, of course, false.
The proof is simply the fact they publish nothing of value given to them. They hoard the data.
Assange doesn't need to be working "with" anyone. Stories you see on the news can occur organically or naturally, but the media decides what gets amplified and what does not.
Julian Assange tried to contact Hillary Clinton and the White House when he realised that unredacted U.S. diplomatic cables given to WikiLeaks were about to be dumped on the internet
Wikileaks could choose to house a tremendous amount of data that they do not. If they were interested in reporting the news, they could house plenty more information like Blumenthal's contact list. Other ones I've mentioned as well, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the WHO... plenty of leaks that show proof of wrong doing and corruption.
Like I said... pick something juicy. Pick something you think the world wants to see. Something newsworthy. I can usually get it. Wikileaks will not publish it.
Why haven't they hunted Hunter Biden's laptop data?
(post is archived)