wikileaks is a psyop?
elaborate in detail please
First, Wikileaks has published only a fraction of a percent of what it has been given. It seems they offer up their silence in exchange for payment before publishing anything.
Second, Trump, at any point, could have ended Assange's imprisonment.
Third, Assange was raised in some weird cult, which should always be a red flag to everyone.
We can keep going from there.
There is no leak war. Wikileaks has published literally nothing we have given them. Not the Wuhan Institute of Virology leaks. Not the WHO leaks. Not contact lists. Not Hunter Biden emails. Fucking absolutely, positively nothing.
The leaks they did publish were highly selective and, while suggestive, are missing a lot of the obvious bombshells.
Keep in mind; Wikileaks did not publish the DNC leaks. "DC Leaks" and "Soros Leaks" published first. Wikileaks merely rehosted this material. The same with Hillary Clinton's emails. Wikileaks merely republished what the FBI very selectively decided to release.
What that leaves is the Podesta leaks. However, those were "out there" already. We already knew John Podesta's passwords; "Runner4567" and "password" among them. So, whether or not Wikileaks published, or not, the Podesta emails were going to come out.
The Stratfor leaks were the same problem. If Wikileaks didn't publish, they were going to be published, anyways.
Notice what happens to a leak when it isn't sanctioned by the left hand of alt right media. Nothing. Nada. Zip. You're lucky if your uploads don't get hash banned on every major site.
Despite the fact that, at this very moment, I have evidence of all kinds of corruption that I could (and do) give to the authorities. Leaks are meaningless. They are totally ignored. Look at Hunter Biden. His data is out there and the left hand of the alt right media told everyone... "Don't release it, we'll do it as an October surprise." So... everyone sits on their hands like idiots. Then, they say, "Well, let us release the more tasteful evidence in censored versions. Just hold on to the uncensored versions." Then both the right and the left media and the entire Internet disappear virtually every piece of damning evidence against the Bidens. The Right betrayed their own and turned out to be a tool of the deep state left.
Remember what happened the last time a few Epstein photos leaked out, with him holding a sleeping girl on the plane? The same day, a pilot/IT guy killed two FBI agents and himself.
Remember the butler who leaked the black book? Also dead.
The people who rule the world from the shadows are not worried about leaks. They clearly control them and feel confident about that control. No unauthorized leak will be given any attention.
I invite anyone to prove me wrong. I can get any kind of leak you want. Then, we can give it to whoever you want and see what they do with it.
It seems they offer up their silence in exchange for payment before publishing anything
That doesn't make them a psyop.
Second, Trump, at any point, could have ended Assange's imprisonment.
If Julian was working with the global elite wouldn't they release him? And if he actually knew anything they didn't want him to they would have killed him.
There is no leak war. Wikileaks has published literally nothing we have given them. Not the Wuhan Institute of Virology leaks. Not the WHO leaks. Not contact lists. Not Hunter Biden emails. Fucking absolutely, positively nothing.
That was after Assange went to prison. I'm not saying it isn't but without the head the body seemed to have died.
Keep in mind; Wikileaks did not publish the DNC leaks. "DC Leaks" and "Soros Leaks" published first. Wikileaks merely rehosted this material. The same with Hillary Clinton's emails. Wikileaks merely republished what the FBI very selectively decided to release.
Yeah, because they report news. Perhaps they're being fed by the FBI but there's no way to know. And they exposed a bunch of Hillary's corruption regarding the DOJ and the media and her husband's political ties among other emails and scandals. Maybe they were just reporting and giving the news a platform?
What that leaves is the Podesta leaks. However, those were "out there" already. We already knew John Podesta's passwords; "Runner4567" and "password" among them. So, whether or not Wikileaks published, or not, the Podesta emails were going to come out.
I don't see how this makes them a psyop.
Despite the fact that, at this very moment, I have evidence of all kinds of corruption that I could (and do) give to the authorities. Leaks are meaningless. They are totally ignored.
The people who rule the world from the shadows are not worried about leaks.
Yes but that still doesn't make wikileaks a psyop.
I can't prove you wrong but you haven't proven yourself correct in any way. It's all conjecture.
They are a psy op in the sense that they exist to make everyone believe that leaks happen and aren't controlled and the "truth gets out, someday." This is, of course, false.
The proof is simply the fact they publish nothing of value given to them. They hoard the data.
Assange doesn't need to be working "with" anyone. Stories you see on the news can occur organically or naturally, but the media decides what gets amplified and what does not.
Julian Assange tried to contact Hillary Clinton and the White House when he realised that unredacted U.S. diplomatic cables given to WikiLeaks were about to be dumped on the internet
Wikileaks could choose to house a tremendous amount of data that they do not. If they were interested in reporting the news, they could house plenty more information like Blumenthal's contact list. Other ones I've mentioned as well, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the WHO... plenty of leaks that show proof of wrong doing and corruption.
Like I said... pick something juicy. Pick something you think the world wants to see. Something newsworthy. I can usually get it. Wikileaks will not publish it.
Why haven't they hunted Hunter Biden's laptop data?
(post is archived)