It seems they offer up their silence in exchange for payment before publishing anything
That doesn't make them a psyop.
Second, Trump, at any point, could have ended Assange's imprisonment.
If Julian was working with the global elite wouldn't they release him? And if he actually knew anything they didn't want him to they would have killed him.
There is no leak war. Wikileaks has published literally nothing we have given them. Not the Wuhan Institute of Virology leaks. Not the WHO leaks. Not contact lists. Not Hunter Biden emails. Fucking absolutely, positively nothing.
That was after Assange went to prison. I'm not saying it isn't but without the head the body seemed to have died.
Keep in mind; Wikileaks did not publish the DNC leaks. "DC Leaks" and "Soros Leaks" published first. Wikileaks merely rehosted this material. The same with Hillary Clinton's emails. Wikileaks merely republished what the FBI very selectively decided to release.
Yeah, because they report news. Perhaps they're being fed by the FBI but there's no way to know. And they exposed a bunch of Hillary's corruption regarding the DOJ and the media and her husband's political ties among other emails and scandals. Maybe they were just reporting and giving the news a platform?
What that leaves is the Podesta leaks. However, those were "out there" already. We already knew John Podesta's passwords; "Runner4567" and "password" among them. So, whether or not Wikileaks published, or not, the Podesta emails were going to come out.
I don't see how this makes them a psyop.
Despite the fact that, at this very moment, I have evidence of all kinds of corruption that I could (and do) give to the authorities. Leaks are meaningless. They are totally ignored.
The people who rule the world from the shadows are not worried about leaks.
Yes but that still doesn't make wikileaks a psyop.
I can't prove you wrong but you haven't proven yourself correct in any way. It's all conjecture.
They are a psy op in the sense that they exist to make everyone believe that leaks happen and aren't controlled and the "truth gets out, someday." This is, of course, false.
The proof is simply the fact they publish nothing of value given to them. They hoard the data.
Assange doesn't need to be working "with" anyone. Stories you see on the news can occur organically or naturally, but the media decides what gets amplified and what does not.
Julian Assange tried to contact Hillary Clinton and the White House when he realised that unredacted U.S. diplomatic cables given to WikiLeaks were about to be dumped on the internet
Wikileaks could choose to house a tremendous amount of data that they do not. If they were interested in reporting the news, they could house plenty more information like Blumenthal's contact list. Other ones I've mentioned as well, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the WHO... plenty of leaks that show proof of wrong doing and corruption.
Like I said... pick something juicy. Pick something you think the world wants to see. Something newsworthy. I can usually get it. Wikileaks will not publish it.
Why haven't they hunted Hunter Biden's laptop data?
(post is archived)