WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

673

"How can that be?" you might ask. Didn't California enact a massive $5 billion increase in gas taxes just a couple years ago that was sold as necessary to cover the shortfall needed to fund road repairs? . How can they be short by even more than they were then, despite collecting $5 billion more?

This is why voting for tax increases is always a losing proposition, even when it's sold as a very worthwhile cause.

"How can that be?" you might ask. Didn't California enact a massive $5 billion increase in gas taxes just a couple years ago that was sold as necessary to cover the shortfall needed to fund road repairs? [Yes, they did.](https://archive.is/gFnoF). How can they be short by even more than they were then, despite collecting $5 billion ***more***? This is why voting for tax increases is always a losing proposition, even when it's sold as a very worthwhile cause.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

It's flawed, but as more and more vehicles become electric, the revenue collected from gasoline taxes is going to continue to fall. If trucks ever go fully electric, the taxes collected on diesel will need to be transferred to a mileage-based system collected at registration.

My comment was more in the vein that electrics don't pay the same share as gasoline cars, even through they use the same roads and cause the same wear as a gasoline car. It's not going to make up shortfalls, just an observation.

[–] 1 pt

Needs to be calculated by ton-mile, not just mile.

[–] 0 pt

It will probably come to that.

[–] 1 pt

Bet you a million dollars the gas taxes don't go away when they start doing that.