>What sources are you looking at for the definition? Provide the link/s. Literally just duckduckgo "antipope". Most of the pages about it seem to agree it's any pretender to the bishopric of rome. Some say it's any "serious" pretender, or any opposition to the "legally elected" bishop, but same diff. >Where did I say he's a false pope because he is a false pope? Seemed to be what you were saying in the last comment, if not fair enough. Anyhow, I've pointed out that you're using a definition of antipope that most people don't share, if you want to keep using it then go ahead.