![The 2nd amndmnt says "the right to bear arms shall not be infringed" So where Constitutionally can a homeless person keep their gun if the courts rule you can only have one in your home? The laws have to apply equally to the lowest common denominator do they not? [787x1024 - 96KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/FYwZcm.jpg){kind=link}
So they are implying we only have the right to defend ourselves inside our homes but not anywhere outside the home? Sounds like infringement to me. The right of the people, not the right of the household. To protect yourself and your loved ones. They seem to think this right is based on location and not an individual right no matter where we are.
So they are implying we only have the right to defend ourselves inside our homes but not anywhere outside the home? Sounds like infringement to me. The right of the people, not the right of the household. To protect yourself and your loved ones. They seem to think this right is based on location and not an individual right no matter where we are.
No, they're just implying you have the right to own legal arms which you are permitted to own, they certainly don't mean to imply you have the right to defend yourself even if in your own home.
No, they're just implying you have the right to own legal arms which you are permitted to own, they certainly don't mean to imply you have the right to defend yourself even if in your own home.
NJ has entered the chat
NJ has entered the chat
Also clearly shows how frightened the government is of an armed citizenry.
Also clearly shows how frightened the government is of an armed citizenry.
(post is archived)