And are you even interested in if he existed or not - or do you have your mind made up?
Because it seems you believe he did not exist.
And are you even interested in if he existed or not - or do you have your mind made up?
I could ask you the same question. I already linked to an hour long video making the argument he did not exist, as well as an entire site dedicated to that question from another researcher. You have addressed none of the arguments given there.
Because it seems you believe he did not exist.
That's right, based on the evidence, it seems more likely he was a concoction of myth-making cultists that grew into a mainstream religion.
I already linked to an hour long video making the argument he did not exist, as well as an entire site dedicated to that question from another researcher. You have addressed none of the arguments given there.
So you handwaved back instead of providing your own argument from your discernment and perception.
Okay.
Im going to send you the complete Chuck Missler collection and if you dont watch my 72 hours of footage including a list of other experts in mathematics, particle physics, quantum theorists, and ex-atheist mensa prodigies all providing their own proof why the bible is the truth...
"Then you have failed to address the arguments given there."
Sure kid, Ill watch your 1 hour video.
That's right, based on the evidence, it seems
Whoa whoa! It seems???
That sounds pretty factual AND serious.
I think you've just won the argument.
Good show!
So you handwaved back instead of providing your own argument from your discernment and perception.
No, I referred to detailed arguments by experts whose arguments I found convinced. Unless we are experts in our own right, that's going to be our starting point. If there's something you don't agree with, state your reasoning or refer to another who has done the refutation for you. None of this is "handwaving". What you did was handwaving because you referred to a nebulous group that just so happens to agree with your position (or so you claim) without any specific reference, nor did you bother to argue against what I referred to.
Im going to send you the complete Chuck Missler collection and if you dont watch my 72 hours of footage including a list of other experts in mathematics, particle physics, quantum theorists, and ex-atheist mensa prodigies all providing their own proof why the bible is the truth...
Oh, is that the same as a 1 hour video condensed and summarized for a layperson audience? No, it fucking isn't. Your bullshit analogy is garbage.
Whoa whoa! It seems??? That sounds pretty factual AND serious.
Sorry to introduce reality into your black and white binary mind, but history is murky. Anybody making absolute claims about the reality of something 2,000 years ago based on scant evidence is deluding themselves.
(post is archived)