Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

177

(post is archived)

[–] • 10 pts

He saved all His insults for the Pharisees and Jewish elites too, calling them vipers.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts (edited )

For the prince of peace to call a group of people "the synagogue of satan" should not be overlooked.

In todays terms, he ripped these people a new one while calling out their lies and bullshit IN PUBLIC for other people to witness.

If you understood what their archaic utterances meant, you would understand Jesus cussed these people out HARD, not just for the sake of "disrspecin' fools" like you and I know in todays culture - but to free those around him from the lies of the snake oil salesman and the spiritual/emotional bondage.

These people were economic terrorists shaking people down with fear and guilt for the little money they had.

Anybody who tells you Jesus isnt the fucking man is siding with, or at worst ignoring his struggle against, 2000 year old usury tax collector kikels who were spiritual snakeoil salesmen.

[–] • 3 pts

These people were are economic terrorists shaking people down with fear and guilt for the little money they had.

Fixed it

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Boy, you really have a chain of anti-Christian jews chattering like mad on this post.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Its just a small grudge they hold.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, I did it every year on Voat. Always generated some illuminating discussions so I think I'll keep doing it here.

[–] • 1 pt

Merchant's and money changers in the temple.

[–] • 4 pts

A bunch of traders and a central bank essentially

[–] • 1 pt

They sold animals as to be made offerings of travelers come to worship and sacrifice, the money changers added a step and a few and consorted with those selling offerings, the selling of offerings was a pollution, the selling of anything in the temple was a great sin, the added money handling which existed only to facilitate a scam of changing money from one kind to another in the temple was beyond profane.

They were not banks but they did use the ticks of usury and fees for profit.

[–] • 6 pts

They pretty much created the first "petrodollar" system; buy our currency in order to be able to buy offerings with it

[–] • 1 pt

Jesus wandered the hinterlands preaching for three years without problem. One week after he whipped the lawyers and bankers (pharisees and money changers) at the Temple, he was nailed to a cross.

[–] • 0 pt

He did it because they were doing business in the temple and because they were selling sacrifices for cash, not because they were Jewish bankers.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Right, it was a cohencidence.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, that thing about turning God's house into a house of merchandise, he didn't really mean that. What he meant to say is "fuck the Jews". Which is ironic considering he was a Jew.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Theres nothing ironic about Jesus being a jew.

The bible shows Jesus' discontent with "those who say they are jews, but are not".

[–] • 0 pt

Based and Christpilled (d3d00swyhr67nd.cloudfront.net)

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah he did a great job keeping that temple a respectful place to pray to the jew god.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Is there any variant of God that isnt a "jew god" in your view?

[–] • 0 pt

All abrahamic gods are the god of the jews. First forced on whites through christianity, and then forced on non-jewish semites as allah. It was originally yahweh, who was just a god of metalworking but it’s role has grown.

Gods that didn’t originate from that abomination are not jewish gods. Interestingly enough, they are often connected to ancestor worship, which ties a racial group together. abrahamic religions are too, if you look at them, except the bloodlines are that of the jewish tribes. Go to church and pay attention to how many times israel or jews are referenced in the songs that are sung.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Go to church and pay attention to how many times israel or jews are referenced in the songs that are sung.

Okay.

Except, once again, Jesus spoke against corrupt churches - and by his own judgement, many of them were corrupt. So if we are using "churches" as a measure for anything, understand many have been subverted and operate more as a business than anything else.

I would liken this to using a politician as a model of the morality of a human being - it's pretty hard to find one who is doing their job correctly, no?

The bible plainly spells out and warns against 'those who say they are jews, but are not, they are the synagogue of satan' - and this is (((who))) these assholes are talking about day and night online.

It's hard for me to see it your way - how a man who lived on Earth, who called out the jewish economic-spiritual terrorists, who rallied against false worship and corrupt churches, who was crucified at the behest of the jewish pharisees for ruining their religious gimmick, who told his followers that the ways of the old testament (the jew testament) were no more (no more circumcision!), who told the jews that they weren't God's chosen ones...

How exactly is that man a "jew god"???

To clarify further - Jesus was from JUDEA (Judah) - one of TWO tribes who in God's good graces after Solomon strayed from God - that's where Jews came from. The other ten tribes are Israelites - they didn't come from Judah/Judea - they aren't jews.

"Jews" don't come from Israel 'the country' which exists in 2021 - that's a piece of land where "israelis" come from that was scratched in on a map after world war 2 because "muh genocide".

Shit, Israel was first a person - and further then it is theorized that Israel was the community of people lost in the desert, and that it was never about a piece of land, but about a covenant between a group of people and God (because they had no home, no land).

So if a church is singing old testament praises to Israel - AFTER God told Solomon that he had one last chance to be a good person or else 85% of his kingdom would be taken from him - AFTER Jesus told the fake jews they were no longer God's chosen people - then they are not actually trying to comprehend the bible.

But as I said judeo influence on judeo - christianity has transformed most churches into tax free cash cows where a hidden, silent group of (((elders))) manage the money and activities of the church.

It's not Christianity, sir... It's JUDEO-Christianity.

A perversion.

You cannot look to Judeo-Christianity and provide me examples of Christianity, just as I can't look at some FTM tranny and provide examples of a man - it's not what it claims to be from the start.

Just for a moment, take all the religion out of it and re-read Jesus' story - he defied the Jewish authority which kept people in emotional/spiritual/economic bondage and peril in his time.

Then they killed him for it.

What?

[–] • 0 pt

This should be weekly.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

*Daily

[–] • 0 pt

You can't oversaturate the message. I posted this once a year five years in a row on Voat and it always generated great discussions.

[–] • 0 pt

so can we just outright start calling glowniggers like anticlutch, aou etc pharisee or will that result in further bannings? lol

[–] • 0 pt

Jesus was a jew himself

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

A Judean, where real "Jews" originate.

Once called Judah.

[–] • 0 pt

Current Jews are shapeshifters, probably Khazarian tricksters in reality.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Correct, shapeshifters.

Look at all the moishe shills attempting to blur the lines between

"Jew God / Jew Book"

"You hate the jews but Jesus was a jew"

"Jesus never existed"

"He existed but failed"

"He was only trying to out jew the jews"

"He was a trickster"

I swear its like being on reddit 10+ years ago.

[–] • 0 pt

Phantom42-1 was the fag who downvote you (since you can't see it yet). But he's a well known dv fag. But I upvoted you, so the balance in the force has been restored.

[–] • -1 pt

He didn't touch anyone, "beat the shit out of", shut up with that nonsense. He threw a fit, flipped over a table, and used a flail to whack a table. Oooo big tough guy sure showed those kikes.

How long was it after that till he was tortured to death? Two days?

This is embarrassing. You are literally saying Jesus "beat the shit out of people", when there is absolutely zero basis for this. Doesn't say that in the Bible. No historical accounts of this violence. Only in your head.

But, let's strip away the myths and fog of time, and look at Jesus as he truly was- a revolutionary man. Charismatic, he developed a new form of religion based on John the Baptist's bizarre rituals, and gained a following quite rapidly. Eventually, they marched on Jerusalem. In the Bible, there's a hint of this- when arriving in Jerusalem, Jesus ordered his followers to sell their cloaks, and use the money to buy SWORDS. They were preparing for a fight. They began rabble-rousing.

The kike priests were worried about this, because Jesus's movement threatened their power structure, so they sought help in dealing with this brewing rebellion from the Romans, specifically Pontius Pilate. Romans were notoriously brutal on potential rebellions, so with the help of traitors among Jesus's followers, he was identified and captured. Then he was tortured to death in a very public fashion, and crucified as an example: "This is what happens when you challenge kike/Roman rule." Decades later, the legend of Jesus remained, and through the mists of time he became the legendary figure we know today.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

The Romans saw what Christianity truly was, an ideology of decadence birthed out of a schism in Judaism.

[–] • 0 pt

Christianity preaches love of the other, just like leftism. It uses White people's love of noble values against us.

[–] • 1 pt

Matthew 10:34 “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.”

[–] • 0 pt

I'm pretty sure it says to reserve your hate for the Wicked, especially about those who lead children astray being better off having a rock tied around their neck and thrown in the waters.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

This whole thread of yours screams millenial reject.

And yes, Jesus did get physical - you can quit your rather extended kvetching about it.

He "drove out" the people from the temple. He didnt "yell at them until they left" - he got upset, like a human being, and did some things.

But hey, lets hear more r/atheism circa 2009 from you even though you couldnt be bothered to do a simple google search to confirm your sperg out before you typed it down below.

[–] • 0 pt

But, let's strip away the myths and fog of time, and look at Jesus as he truly was

It's possible he didn't even exist (youtube.com).

[–] • 1 pt

I've considered that frequently. Btw, that speaker looks remarkably jewish. Look at that 'fro.

I do believe Jesus existed, and he was just a revolutionary. He failed, and his friends, scattered to the winds, wrote stories about him. They embellished and exaggerated. They were bitter, so they wrote as if they had already won.

Then like 200 years later, some Europeans scrapped all of these writings together, made who knows what changes (most people couldn't read at the time, so the original scriptures may be entirely lost and nobody would know except King James and his people) to the writings.

I'll never understand how people trust the Bible so implicitly. It's full of contradictions and bizarre nonsense. It's literally a fan-fiction sequel to the kike's Old Testament. If that was indeed the word of God, it should be plain, easy for ANY to understand. But no- it's been almost 2000 years since the Bible as we know it today was made, and people are still trying to figure it out. One Christian can read a verse and take an entirely different meaning than another individual who read the same passage.

Finally, the religion of Christianity has become inexorably warped by the European Renaissance. A lot of nonsense came to be, such as the typical appearance of an angel being an attractive man/woman with beautiful white wings. That's not what angels look like... this is what angels look like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gGJY9rsuiM

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

One Christian can read a verse and take an entirely different meaning than another individual who read the same passage.

Songs arent real!

One person can hear a song and it meams something specific to them, then another person hears the same song and it means a totally different thing!

Its a fucking jewish scam goys!

You subjective little cunt.

If you could hear yourself talk from outside yourself, even you'd agree you sound fucking retarded.

But no- it's been almost 2000 years since the Bible as we know it today was made, and people are still trying to figure it out.

Because its not a fucking car repair manual you tard.

Its a recipe for your life and your soul - part of it is a historical account, and part of it is instruction, and the rest is up to you.

[–] • 0 pt

Btw, that speaker looks remarkably jewish. Look at that 'fro.

Don't care if he is or he isn't (though the fro looks like a perm to me) if his argument is sound. He's not the only one to make these arguments, see for example, Ken Humphreys (jesusneverexisted.com). The record for a historical Jesus is essentially nil, and relies on pure mythological texts like the gospels.

I do believe Jesus existed, and he was just a revolutionary.

I believe there were multiple preachers and cults from that time that could have fit the mold in various aspects, such as the "Sons of Light" that kept the Dead Sea Scrolls. But "Jesus" was a constructed figure.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

So many ivy league universities have attempted takedowns of world religions as historical fable and they always conclude Jesus was a real person who existed in our timeline.

[–] • 0 pt

So many ivy league universities have attempted takedowns of world religions as historical fable and they always conclude Jesus was a real person who existed in our timeline.

That's not an argument. That's a handwave. I could do the same -- so many apologists have attempted to prop of the historical Jesus myth, but they have all ultimately failed.

[–] • 0 pt

used a flail to whack a table

I've never seen that before. How do you figure?

[–] • 1 pt

You're right! Seems that's another myth that sprung up, probably out of Hollywood. Here's the exact passage where OP says Jesus "beat the shit" out of people (there's like 5 versions of this, because it's from the Bible, but I'll pick the simplest one):

Jesus entered the temple courts and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves. “It is written,” he said to them, “‘My house will be called a house of prayer,’ but you are making it ‘a den of robbers.

So he just flipped some tables over and made a sick burn. And this is how ridiculous the Bible can be, this is what came next:

The chief priests and the teachers of the law heard this and began looking for a way to kill him, for they feared him, because the whole crowd was amazed at his teaching

So the onlookers who saw this amazing act of flipping over a table and saying "it is written", the crowd was awed, floored even, and they all immediately wanted to join Jesus. So the kike priests were like "Time to kill this guy".

It fits my theory about Jesus just being a revolutionary perfectly. A man threatening the status quo, charismatic enough to gain a following, and then start making unrest during a kike holiday in their holiest city. It's so obvious, this kind of shit has happened in history so many times- just a few individuals (such as Jesus or the Muhammad) were active at the right time and place for mythology to form around them. Christianity is the result of a failed rebellion. Islam is the result of a warlord who was so dominant, he was able to conquer and convince his region (using a lot of kike methods, no less) that he was divine, and then the myth built from there.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.

No. Its in there.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

What do you think "drove out" means as it was written then?

You are reading an old book translated several times through the eyes of a millenial and then pretending to understand because you recognize the printed words.

[–] • 0 pt

I never quoted passages. Don't bear false witness.