Thank you
They should both be trivial to find.
Any help would be appreciated
No time, heres some scraps :
Harvard economist Roland Fryer Jr. — who happens to be African American — found in 2016 that police are more likely to shoot white suspects than black suspects, if there is any racial bias in such shootings. (Jews and other niggers attacked his research, so he recently updated his paper)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w22399?utm_campaign=ntw&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ntw
a 2018 censored version of 2016 fact bomb paper :
https://files.catbox.moe/6ha1bu.pdf
The Black researcher CENSORED HIMSELF and deleted all online copies of the 2016 data!
The revision does add one note though to not look too kiked : "Fryer also updated his 2016 research to note that there appeared to be no racial bias in police shootings."
Prior to that , there was a extreme bias shown... a BIAS AGAINST WHITE SUSPECTS!!!!!!!
July 13, 2016 (((Washington Post))) : How a controversial study found that police are more likely to shoot whites, not blacks: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/07/13/why-a-massive-new-study-on-police-shootings-of-whites-and-blacks-is-so-controversial/
Roland Fryer is only one nigger revisionist though, other shocking papers by other Blacks exist, some using state data instead of national data.
Brietbart covers a lot of this topic with some links :
even (((WSJ))) :
The Myth of Systemic Police Racism:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-myth-of-systemic-police-racism-11591119883
In 2019 police officers fatally shot 1,004 people, most of whom were armed or otherwise dangerous. African-Americans were about a quarter of those killed by cops last year (235), a ratio that has remained stable since 2015. That rate is also far less than should be based on races of arrest records.
using DOI citation searches TO the Harvard Roland Fryer paper will find many more papers written after 2016 that cite it...
DOI 10.3386/w22399
remember the 2016 version of "AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN POLICE USE OF FORCE" from harvard is only one paper.
For these papers to exist at all... the authors have to be black. (jew rule number one to prevent being cancelled fully). Additionally, they have to hide the truth bombs in the raw data tables and hand wave, and try to massage the data and explain it away.
134 Citations : see?!:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C23&q=DOI+10.3386%2Fw22399&btnG=
Not all those 134 will be novel or useful, a couple should be very interesting finds....
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=16881397968945726041&as_sdt=80000005&sciodt=0,23&hl=en
If you build a "two degrees of separation" citation search, you will get 800,000 papers, of which 10 more will prove useful to your needs.
Thank you,
By concentrating the dose cognitive dissonance may be overcome yet.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=16881397968945726041&as_sdt=80000005&sciodt=0,23&hl=en
more slop to churn through
(post is archived)