I've seen footage that suggests that the plane is cgi. I know how that building is constructed and theoretically what would happen to a plane that crashed into a building of that construction type. The fuel tanks are in the wings... wings wouldn't penetrate that building.

It's hard to say. Also that footage you linked, the 'plane' supposedly came from the other side. That's why the explosion comes out all the other 3 sides. The momentum of the fuel smashing through the building. According to their theory. I don't really have a better theory other than a basic understanding of how materials interact. I suppose it's possible that the wings smash into the building, smash the exterior, and momentum carries tons of jet fuel through into the office where it explodes.

Wow bitchute has 95 crackpots. Talk about hard hitting evidence. Im shocked.

• Exterior steel frame tube column verses "Durable aluminum alloy and composite structure" Boeing 767, absent evidence of plane debris and correct Engine model on claimed find.

• Tower 7

• Eyewitness accounts of no planes, explosions instead.

• Modified and difficult to locate CNN chopper footage over the Hudson of the infamous "nose through tower" shot. The camera operator is the author of a book in Video Composting Tech, that details how to use a vertical backdrop for live editing of CGI. If you GIF stablizer the video you'll see the planes path does not become smooth as it would if it was captured at the same time as the rest of the scene. Instead you'll find the plane is unstable after stabilizing the video, because it was an added layer effect on a live capture backdrop. The entire nose through tower fuckup is compelling.

• jews, thermite and fireproofing wall mossad op

I've found the Energy Weapon theory interesting however as far as i can tell there were no planes involved that day. Yes the people were taken, to where i haven't a clue.

CGI/Photoshop has become one of their most powerful levers and still many won't ask the big question honestly.