not "fish eyes", fish eye lense
you clearly know nothing about photography if that statement made you laugh
or your just a pathetic kike trying to use mockery to discredit an argument that supercedes your own.
Im Norwegian and not a jew. I just dont see them having that level of CGI in the 50s and 60s that argument is pathetic.
cgi?
you mean those grainy ass video's they "livestreamed" "on delay" lmfao
you should look deeper into the nasa deception then if you think that
Photoshop for example, invented right around ww2...can you think of any "photographic" evidence around that point in history that might have been used for political purposes?
also, it wasn't cgi, you can find clips recorded from sets where it's made obvious they are in a studio and not "in space"
I can believe NASA is a hoax, I dont have any problem with that. I do however have a problem being the only flat planet in the universe when all the othe objects in space are round.
I never ever thought I would be discussing something so obviously wrong. I grew up very in tune to my surroundings. I've had a pretty hard life and grew into cynicism rather smoothly. So call me NEO because if it doesnt register with my senses or my deepdiving the subject then I cant believe it.
So seriously I've seen EVERYTHING on youtube about flat earth and I've read everything I could find and NONE of it sits right on tooooo many levels.
(post is archived)