Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

972

Apparently we arent allowed to promote the most normal and natural food for infants anymore because their mothers may choose not to vaccinate. Calling it what it is (natural) could lead to such dangerous ideas as "skepticism" and "desire for knowledge" the horror!!

Thanks (((AAP))) for clearing that up.

Apparently we arent allowed to promote the most normal and natural food for infants anymore because their mothers may choose not to vaccinate. Calling it what it is (natural) could lead to such dangerous ideas as "skepticism" and "desire for knowledge" the horror!! Thanks (((AAP))) for clearing that up.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (40).
[–] • 3 pts

Let me check my reading comprehension skills.

Did that tard just say that someone wanting to know More about being healthy is a bad thing?

If that's the case then why bother publishing stuff like that? It will be read by people wanting to learn how to be healthier!

[–] • 3 pts

Your eyes are correct. They are upset that saying Breastfeeding = Natural = healthiest for baby is a bad thing because they may not accept conventional medical advice.

Medical advice by the way which is stubborn to change and not as based in evidence as people are led to believe. For example, they have been promoting SAD (standard American diet) for 100 years and people have only gotten fatter and sicker and it has had exactly ZERO positive impact on heart disease despite what Ansel Keys said. Yet stubbornly they continue to promote this as the best and healthiest diet. Doctors who promote alternative diets, who tell their patients fat is not a dangerous substance to avoid, risk their PHD and practice. Doctors who have studied the evidence and come to the conclusion that SAD is toxic.