I'm not asking for donations there and I don't link to MSM. This is a feature to promote content in the featured box using cryptocurrency if you want to.
not asking for donations
Lies... https://pic8.co/sh/Vm5KWj.jpg
I don't link to MSM
TRS, War Room, infowars, RT, natural news, Jordan Peterson, Tommy Robinson, disclose TV
Would you like to amend your response?
I was referring to the previous screenshot you posted which is not a donations request but rather where the post can get promoted to the featured section, it's basically like ad spend.
Those are not mainstream media sources. In fact they have been banned on multiple platforms all over the world which is why they qualify to be on the site.
I could not care less of your opinion unless you decide to take harsh criticism and make your site better rather than defending literal jewish media.
Tommy Robinson: literal jew by proxy given a platform on "alt sites," in order to subvert "radicalization"
Peterson: drug addict given back a platform (meager as it is) only after he refused to answer the question of how he feels about Americans being treated the same as how Bolshevik jews in Soviet Russia treated White Christian bloodlines
Infowars: OK retard. Buy my vitamins & accept my rants as the only reliable source even though thousands have spoke the same truths & not grifted while doing so
Disclose TV: pays for a subscription to jewish AP wire & republishes word for word most of the time
War Room: shilling to "conservatives" for do nothing but vote political stance. Who could be behind this?
Natural News: English as a 2nd language site that caters to "conservatives" that don't need proof but rather a click bait headline
TRS: literal jew site intending to subvert the masses & infiltrate right wing or Nationalist groups. Has failed miserably at this & entire leadership has imploded w/ doxxing of members & private chats
RT: history was not your best subject in school was it?
Those aren't mainstream
You do know that Honeybadger QR codes don't care about scribbles on them, right?
The UI is bad
Thanks for the feedback. What would you change?
The UI is fine. Everything there at a glance.
The look of it. The nostalgia of 90’s style websites has worn off for me. There’s nothing wrong with looking sleek and professional as far as todays standards are concerned. After all the content is what matters. Having this style of UI will turn off professionals. You can agree or disagree but I’m telling you the truth as I see it
(post is archived)