![Finally Mark has come back to poal! [990x950 - 145KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/76QjrX.jpg){kind=link}
Except his entire premise is bullshit.
Antibody testing on healthy people shows us that we are not catching all of the cases (this means that healthy people were exposed, successfully fought off the illness, and now carry around the antibodies). All-Cause deaths have significantly increased telling us we aren't even catching all the COVID-19 deaths.
What does this mean? We are undercounting deaths and cases for SARS-CoV-2.
Either this virus was created in a lab with NIH funding, via gain of function research, and released to kill millions of people around the world or it is all made up. Since we have evidence that it is not made up, the engineered deadly virus is the far better explanation.
All-Cause deaths have significantly increased telling us we aren't even catching all the COVID-19 deaths.
No it doesn't, it tells us something has caused an increase in deaths, not that that thing must be the wuflu.
No it doesn't
Yes it does. We have the research, peer reviewed and published, that told us this. This is not something you are I can debate. These are the facts of reality. The reality that we live in, now.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2778234
https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/934504
If you disagree with the myriad scientists who research this and publish it, feel free to pick through the readily available data and prove them wrong. I look forward to your riveting and detailed research into the matter.
Your claim was that all-cause deaths have increased, and that we should assume the excess were caused by the wuflu. That is an assumption, not a fact.
I won't dignify the "trust the science" bit with a response.
(post is archived)