Democracy
>Democracy
This is ranty, deal with it. The peices can be put together and you'll see I'm right.
He coined the label Fascism, but not actually. He drew from Fasces, a word that existed for 2000+ years and was applicable outside of his "creation".
That Italian faggot (he was rather swarthy, is he actually Italian or a muzzie?) is why so many people thru modern historians, modern intellectuals etc. grasp onto the "Authoritarian ism and totalitarianism are the same thing!!" lie. It's so low IQ, worse than the idea that Whites are from Africa - primarily because the former is taught to adults, while the latter is taught to adolescent children, so I can't be that mad.
Authoritarian is a manner of Fascism which in its fundamental ideals is nationalism, which is philia (Greek) or amicitia (Roman). As drawn from Aristotle on democracy (another fundamental ideal of nationalism, read on)
Aristotle on democracy:
Mussolini was a civnat (civic nationalist, think Trump) cuck. He HATED the idea of Nationalism, absolutely despised it. His alliance with Hitler was due to his understanding of his cuck position, he had absolutely n o power, no authority and no ability. PRIMARILY DUE TO HIS RACIAL CUCKOLDRY - as muzzie rape babies tend to be.
Now fast forward to the US, the founding fathers understood VERY VERY VERY well the idea of ALL of the above (except the chronologically impossible to understand bits). They knew the US wasn't TRULY nationalist, but they made it as close to possible with what, at the time, was 90% (give or take) nationalism.
They also had a fundamental understanding that RACE = German, Swedish, Norse, English etc. That 90% goes right out the window real quick. Which is why STATES were to have the power OVER the federal government, it's very clearly written. So when it came to be, there would be a British state, a German state etc.
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."
Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay
Put it all together, finish the US branch, it's easy. You'll hate me, but you know I'm right.
This is ranty, deal with it. The peices can be put together and you'll see I'm right.
He coined the label Fascism, but not actually. He drew from Fasces, a word that existed for 2000+ years and was applicable outside of his "creation".
That Italian faggot (he was rather swarthy, is he actually Italian or a muzzie?) is why so many people thru modern historians, modern intellectuals etc. grasp onto the "Authoritarian ism and totalitarianism are the same thing!!" lie. It's so low IQ, worse than the idea that Whites are from Africa - primarily because the former is taught to adults, while the latter is taught to adolescent children, so I can't be that mad.
Authoritarian is a manner of Fascism which in its fundamental ideals is nationalism, which is philia (Greek) or amicitia (Roman). As drawn from Aristotle on democracy (another fundamental ideal of nationalism, read on)
Aristotle on democracy:
>[For Aristotle, democracy is possible only within homogeneous ethnic groups, while despots have always reigned over highly fragmented societies...](https://poal.co/static/images/8001012121616161.jpg)
Mussolini was a civnat (civic nationalist, think Trump) cuck. He HATED the idea of Nationalism, absolutely despised it. His alliance with Hitler was due to his understanding of his cuck position, he had absolutely n o power, no authority and no ability. PRIMARILY DUE TO HIS RACIAL CUCKOLDRY - as muzzie rape babies tend to be.
Now fast forward to the US, the founding fathers understood VERY VERY VERY well the idea of ALL of the above (except the chronologically impossible to understand bits). They knew the US wasn't TRULY nationalist, but they made it as close to possible with what, at the time, was 90% (give or take) nationalism.
They also had a fundamental understanding that RACE = German, Swedish, Norse, English etc. That 90% goes right out the window real quick. Which is why STATES were to have the power OVER the federal government, it's very clearly written. So when it came to be, there would be a British state, a German state etc.
>"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."
>>Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay
Put it all together, finish the US branch, it's easy.
You'll hate me, but you know I'm right.
You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (2).