WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

810

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Bakers got really into technology around 2002, so they decided to make their mark on the Internet. Using e-cookies, they could make the web easier for users, online stores, and (especially) advertisers.

From then on, the likes Little Debbie, Betty Crocker, and everyone's granny choked the Internet with annoying pop-ups to ensure that no matter how things went with fad diets, health concerns, and food prices, they'd always be on top.

[–] 2 pts

Big cookie has been oppressing the common web user for a while now.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Reject or ignore them, it doesn't matter. They're still collecting data from you.

I don't really know that for sure, but it's probably true. Everything, every single fucking thing in this world, is corrupt.

I'm wichu, if a site axs for cookies I leave. Especially when using tor.

[–] 1 pt

California passed a law in 2018 that required websites to inform you that they're spying on you and request permission to do so. Websites before were obviously still spying on you, they just didn't have to tell you.

It's like all those prop 65 notices you see everywhere. Information saturation makes the warnings completely useless.

[–] 1 pt

Sure you can. Most are scripted by jews and all you have to do is block the frame that's taking mouse focus from the frame below it. ublock can do this. You should use ublock.

[–] 1 pt

You're not allowed to connect to sites unless they can monitor and monetize your data.

[–] 1 pt

Web 3.0 Fuck you Bill Gates

[–] 1 pt

At least Web 2.0 was tolerable with all the overboard CSS shit

Do you keep a .357 revolver and the king james version of the bible on your nightstand?

[–] 2 pts

2 nines

[–] 1 pt

You can use an extension to delete all or specific cookies from some websites, automatically. It's called "cookie autodelete".

[–] 1 pt

It's only Jewropean Jewnion websites. What are you doing visiting the handrubbing goblins' internet presence?

Load more (4 replies)