In other words...to consent to any suggested information puts one into the conflict of reason aka want (him being a bot) vs not want (him not being a bot). What I do is questioning the ignored need (perceived inspiration) underneath the want (suggested information). The conflict you perceive (agreement vs disagreement)...I'm not in it; I didn't consent to your suggested accusations. I get both praise and insults nonstop; which is what inspired me to comprehend the temptation of want (praise) vs not want (insults) for my position as choice at the center of balance (need/want). So I need to resist both praise and insults.
Go write a book or something.
That would imply binding myself to the words suggested. Nah
If I didn't know better, I'd say this is a shitpost. Except it's too on the nose to be a shitpost.
Which tells me you're not a shitposter, and my first assumption was correct.
(post is archived)