The idea that you can simple believe the opposite of what a liar says is just as stupid as believing everything they say. They are manipulators not retards.
Disbelieving and/or discounting anything that a liar says is generally a good starting point and standard policy. It's a simple matter of jurisprudence that anyone found to be giving false testimony is automatically disbelieved and distrusted from that point onwards.
But by all means, continue to believe them if you choose. Don't bother getting back to me about how that works out for you, I really don't care.
The way you pretend to completely misunderstand what I said is very Jewish.
Disbelieving someone and believing that the opposite of what they say must be true are completely different things.
I clearly did not say you should believe them. I literally said it is stupid. So is taking what they say as proof of the opposite.
You know the best thing about a conversation like this?
We'll never, ever have to have it again.
Bye-bye.
(post is archived)