![Why archive sites are important: 2.8 megabytes of Javascript code at NYT, 8000 requests for elements, sets 20 cookies, constant running code. [1917x951 - 198KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/VXWN8o.png){kind=link}
How does NYT being a really horrible website make archive sites not important?
How does NYT being a really horrible website make archive sites not important?
Non sequitur.
It's not just the NYT.
Non sequitur.
It's not just the NYT.
How does a proliferation of horrible websites across the internet make archive sites not important?
How does a proliferation of horrible websites across the internet make archive sites not important?
Archive sites allow you to avoid malicious use of your own machine against you by a multitude of anonymous interests.
Archive sites allow you to avoid malicious use of your own machine against you by a multitude of anonymous interests.
(post is archived)