![Look how they demonetize the exposure of a mainstream media producer who was literally building his own child sex trafficking ring from scratch. [1080x1257 - 631KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/pJSK8H.png){kind=link}
it doesn't matter what's in the video, google isn't going to monetize a video that has child sex grooming in the title. They'll make an exception for their legacy media partners but you can't monetize video's with no-no words in them.
It's not about CNN, it's about advertisers not liking no-no words. Reupload it without directly using 'child sex grooming'. It's retarded but if you call it unwanted child sharing or some bullshit, you'll get your ad money.
it doesn't matter what's in the video, google isn't going to monetize a video that has child sex grooming in the title. They'll make an exception for their legacy media partners but you can't monetize video's with no-no words in them.
It's not about CNN, it's about advertisers not liking no-no words. Reupload it without directly using 'child sex grooming'. It's retarded but if you call it unwanted child sharing or some bullshit, you'll get your ad money.
I understand.
It's on par with the Hunter Biden leaks.
No one is ever going to see it under the current paradigm, even though it is publicly available and is a high priority problem.
I understand.
It's on par with the Hunter Biden leaks.
No one is ever going to see it under the current paradigm, even though it is publicly available and is a high priority problem.
(post is archived)