I would imagine the argument is whether or not this is enough information to find out who they are exactly. And I don’t know the answer to that so I’m staying out of it. But it’s clear the media knows who these people are to a great degree, might be watching their families, and could easily give that information to someone who needs it. That’s not necessarily unusual but this does feel like a threat, letting the jurors know “we can get to your family.” Perhaps I’m just being paranoid but that is one way to interpret the media coming out with an article that strangely focuses on the personal lives of the jurors