!["Don't mind me... just gonna doxx the jurors on the Ghislaine Maxwell Case" - Bloomberg [1599x2178 - 782KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/2hIVQP.jpg){kind=link}
This isn't doxxing
Not exactly but if autists can find a flag from a video against a blue sky, this is enough information to dox them properly. Some of that is enough to suspect someone of being a juror if you knew one of those people.
Wouldn’t take much to suspect. If you work with someone that fits one of these descriptions and they’re suddenly missing from work for jury duty, you’ll know it’s them, and probably tell people.
Yes it is. This would not be tolerated in any other case. What it really achieves is to offer plausible deniability for how the details got out, so if some guy just happens to threaten the jurors he's not connected to the defence, he just read about them in the papers and recognised that one guy.
This.
Do we know each other?
Outside of here? I have no idea.
It is more than enough to start running ads to mindfuck them.
Releasing personal details in a public forum isn't doxing?
I would imagine the argument is whether or not this is enough information to find out who they are exactly.
And I don’t know the answer to that so I’m staying out of it.
But it’s clear the media knows who these people are to a great degree, might be watching their families, and could easily give that information to someone who needs it.
That’s not necessarily unusual but this does feel like a threat, letting the jurors know “we can get to your family.” Perhaps I’m just being paranoid but that is one way to interpret the media coming out with an article that strangely focuses on the personal lives of the jurors
(post is archived)