Yes it is. This would not be tolerated in any other case. What it really achieves is to offer plausible deniability for how the details got out, so if some guy just happens to threaten the jurors he's not connected to the defence, he just read about them in the papers and recognised that one guy.
Yes it is. This would not be tolerated in any other case. What it really achieves is to offer plausible deniability for how the details got out, so if some guy just happens to threaten the jurors he's not connected to the defence, he just read about them in the papers and recognised that one guy.
This.
Do we know each other?
This.
Do we know each other?
Outside of here? I have no idea.
Outside of here? I have no idea.
(post is archived)